Search for: "Whitaker v. Whitaker" Results 61 - 80 of 262
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Serah Karingithi, a native of Kenya, overstayed her six-month tourist visa in 2006. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Here’s the amicus brief filed in November 2018 in Chicago v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 1:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Whitaker (D.D.C. filed Jan. 15, 2019) argues that this violates the First Amendment. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am by William Ford
Alan Rozenshtein flagged a forthcoming article he wrote for the Yale Law Journal Forum arguing that the Supreme Court was wrong to conclude that the government needed a warrant to collect large quantities of cell-phone location data in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
., who until now recused himself in a pending copyright case, Rimini Street Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Robert Stanley
Unitary Event Rule in the Whitaker Test The proper crime exception test to follow is the unitary event rule in State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 2:00 pm by Robert Liles
Recent Changes to DOJ’s “Justice Manual” Addressing De-Facto Regulations (December 27, 2018):  On November 16, 2017, Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued a memorandum[1] (Sessions Memo) [2]  to all components of the U.S. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Whitaker, interstate sales by gun dealers] “Bump Stock Rule Bumps Up Against the Constitution” [Shapiro and Larosiere] “The Most Common Firearm in America is Not a ‘Weapon of War’” [same on Cato amicus brief in Worman v. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am by William Ford
Orin Kerr flagged two draft chapters he wrote on implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 9:50 am by Rachel Brown
Zach ZhenHe Tan assessed the impact of Jesner v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
” The bill follows the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
The justices also issued one opinion yesterday: In United States v. [read post]