Search for: "Wildlife Farms II LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2016, 4:50 pm
§ 1539(a)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:21 pm
Leflar; Law Clerk, McMath Woods, P.A.; Public Interest Extern, Attorney General for the Cherokee Nation; Corporate Extern, Walmart Stores, Inc.; Law Clerk, Mostyn Prettyman; Pro Bono Law Clerk, Legal Aid of Arkansas; Research Intern, Nature Conservancy; Consultant, Arkansas Wildlife FederationDistance LL.M. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Bridge Aina Le’a, LLC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
II. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
Click Here Clean Water Act Class II: Proposed Administrative Settlement, Penalty Assessment, and Opportunity To Comment Regarding Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc. and Hydro Aluminum Precision Tubing North America, LLC, wholly owned subsidiaries of Norsk Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
On or about October 22, 2009, Wildearth Guardians filed an amended complaint alleging that EPA Administrator Jackson failed to comply with a mandatory duty to fully or partially approve or disapprove State Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions from the States of Colorado, Montana, New Mexico and Utah within the time frame required by section 110(k)(2) of the Act and asking the court to enter judgment providing: (i) A declaration that EPA has violated and continues to violate the Act by failing to… [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Bridge Aina Le’a, LLC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 (1992) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
State Farm Gen. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Bridge Aina Le’a, LLC v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Caltrans refused and petitioners filed suit on November 1, 2017, alleging (i) that Caltrans improperly relied on section 103, (ii) that the department is estopped from relying on the 35-day statute of limitations period, and (iii) additional claims on the merits of the adequacy of the FEIR for the project. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drought period, and CDFW recommended additional studies. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
The real estate company, MA No. 2, LLC (MA2), is a Nevada corporation that owns the Parkview Apartments on Federal Street in Springfield. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drought period, and CDFW recommended additional studies. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drought period, and CDFW recommended additional studies. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Zaclon LLC, which operates a chemical manufacturing plant at 2981 Independence Road, and Independence Land Development Co., the property owner, “have addressed the violations and now operate in compliance with Ohio’s hazardous waste laws,” Ohio EPA said in a news release. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The other three defendants include the City of West Point, West Point Dairy Products, LLC, (WPDP); and Wimmers Meat Products, Inc. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drough [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
EPA’s response to any comments received will be available for public inspection at EPA Region II, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007–1866. [read post]
