Search for: "Wildlife Preservation, LLC"
Results 41 - 53
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drought period, and CDFW recommended additional studies. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drought period, and CDFW recommended additional studies. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
As to a third plant, a special status species, the appellate court also found that the administrative record contained sufficient evidence to support a fair argument that mitigation through onsite preservation or offsite restoration may not succeed, and therefore there may be a significant impact. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drough [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:28 pm
Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 (1992). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
(PCI) and Poli-Gold, LLC (Poli-Gold) for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act at Panguitch Lake in Garfield County, Utah. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court will consider the constitutionality of HB20 in NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
(“Arkema”), Solvay Flourides, LLC, and Solvay Solexis, Inc. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
This case is potentially at odds with the decision in Georgetown Preservation Society v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Furthermore, the discretion of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (the “Department”) to impose conditions that could ameliorate the project’s environmental impacts could not be imputed to the Board. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 11:31 am
Jill Grant & Associates, LLC Attorney. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The other three defendants include the City of West Point, West Point Dairy Products, LLC, (WPDP); and Wimmers Meat Products, Inc. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. [read post]
