Search for: "William D Ing"
Results 161 - 180
of 237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2008, 3:54 pm
Judge Wood, together with Judges William J. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
NEWEST ADDITION TO HECHT COURT'S IMMUNITY JURIS(MAL)PRUDENCE: DRUNK DRIVER IMMUNITY Here is yet another example of the Texas Supreme Court's penchant for creating and invoking immunity theories to deny plaintiffs their day in court against a party that caused injury, and thereby preventing a trial on the merits and recovery of damages from the tortfeasor proven to have committed the tort. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Murray was prepared with responses to these sorts of concerns: He explained, correctly, that there’s not a great deal of dispute concerning the facts about what occurred on January 6, 2021; that the Colorado district court gave Trump every opportunity to introduce whatever evidence he wished to include in the record (including his own testimony, which he declined to offer); and that, at least with respect to the one question on which there is a substantial factual… [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Wade, observed that when the Court, in the absence of “the most compelling reason,” overrules a “watershed” decision “under [political] fire,” it runs the risk of “subvert[ing] the Court’s own legitimacy beyond any serious question. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am
(d) If the fund exceeds the amount needed to make payments as provided in this order, the court will order an refund to those who have contributed to the fund. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 3:41 pm
” D. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Kang, No. 3:21-CV-01266-HZ, 2022 WL 2967455 (D. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:57 am
" Ultimately, these categories are designed to provide guidance to district courts in "balanc[ing] the interests asserted by the movant in favor of privacy against the public interest in transparency, taking all relevant circumstances into account. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
No one disputes that Article I, Section 9 would bar the Secretaries from “draw[ing]” funds from the Treasury if the Executive’s statutory interpretation turns out to be mistaken. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
D the courts have the capacity (or the authority) to parse these offerings? [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The superintendent avers that he also learned in September 2016 that petitioner had been “grad[ing] students in her seventh grade mathematics classes at an extremely low level. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The superintendent avers that he also learned in September 2016 that petitioner had been “grad[ing] students in her seventh grade mathematics classes at an extremely low level. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The superintendent avers that he also learned in September 2016 that petitioner had been “grad[ing] students in her seventh grade mathematics classes at an extremely low level. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The superintendent avers that he also learned in September 2016 that petitioner had been “grad[ing] students in her seventh grade mathematics classes at an extremely low level. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
It's been almost a year since my last series of posts on the fallout from Hobby Lobby--in particular, on the challenges by nonprofit organizations to the government's augmented religious accommodation. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 7:55 am
I am deighted to pass along the announcement of the publication of (Anne Wagner and Sarah Marusek (eds)) Research Handbook on Legal Semiotics (Edward Elgar, 2023). [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
’” William J. [read post]
20 May 2019, 10:55 am
Barr’s memo defines immunized conduct by contrasting it to “inherently wrongful, subversive acts” which “sabotag[e] a proceeding’s truth-finding function,” such as “suborn[ing] perjury, or induc[ing] a witness to change testimony. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
As Judge Williams of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:44 am
I’m pleased to report that the First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic filed an amicus brief Saturday on behalf of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the ACLU of Virginia in Radiance Foundation v. [read post]
