Search for: "William Marshall, III"
Results 81 - 100
of 205
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2018, 10:40 am
A drawing of judicial combat found on an assize roll from the reign of Henry III (1216-1272) reproduced from Select Pleas of the Crown. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
If neither the executive nor legislative branch of the federal government may unilaterally change the meaning of the Constitution, neither should the judiciary be able to do so.In identifying precedents to support this view, we pointed first to John Marshall’s fountainhead 1803 opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
Bamzai argued that these military justice cases are not really cases at all, as understood by the Framers in drafting Article III or by Chief Justice Marshall. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
William Goldschlag and Dan Janison report for Governing that Trump has “tipped the result he anticipated from a Supreme Court recast to his liking — that the legality of abortion ‘could very well end up with states at some point. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:47 am
Froelich, whatever happened to William Marbury, and whether he ever got his commission as a justice of the peace. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:00 am
Citing to 1933’s Williams v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
Mueller III’s ongoing probe into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election — remain outside his control, according to his aides and advisers. [read post]
7 May 2018, 7:09 am
Madison, Hamilton, Marshall). [read post]
4 May 2018, 8:30 am
For better or for worse, the fear of defiance has long been an important constraint on judicial power; Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:15 pm
Indeed, an 1818 opinion by Attorney General William Wirt (quoted in a 2000 OLC opinion) suggested that, “[a] subpoena ad testificandum may I think be properly awarded to the President of the U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Over the last couple of years, I've been looking closely at injunctions against libel, and I've come to agree with the emerging view in recent appellate court decisions -- such injunctions, if properly crafted, are constitutional. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 3:16 am
Citing Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution, Marshall pointed out that the Supreme Court was given original jurisdiction only in cases “affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls” or in cases “in which a State shall be Party. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
(iii) Although the verbatim quotes in question were an insubstantial portion of the Ford manuscript, they qualitatively embodied Mr. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
No. 16-0107 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ---------------------------------------------------------Albert G. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
The Court held that Article III of the Constitution granted federal courts the power to hear disputes between private citizens and states. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 2:45 am
White, William H. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 1:01 am
He was especially active in defense of Article III, which provides for the Federal judiciary. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
May a payday lender enforce arbitration clause after wrongfully filing bad-check affidavits and procuring criminal prosecution of borrowers in aid of collecting civil debt when debtors turn the tables on them and sue? [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 4:52 am
William Alexander McQueen, who was 22. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 2:55 am
Lee) and future attorney general William Wirt assisting Jefferson. [read post]
