Search for: "William P. Rogers" Results 41 - 60 of 345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2017, 4:59 am by Diane Marie Amann
Schabas ► Foreword by Diane Marie Amann* and Margaret M. deGuzman,* coeditors ► Introduction: William Schabas: Portrait of a Scholar/Activist Extraordinaire by Roger S. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:31 am by JB
A few weeks back I gave a keynote address at a conference on "Popular Constitutionalism and the 2012 Election" held at Roger Williams Law School in Bristol, Rhode Island. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:41 am by Jeralyn
fn4 See, e.g., Hearing Testimony of William Roger Clemens, February 13, 2008 at page 87: Mr. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:52 pm by We Defend
This was only a conflict where the witness contradicts what he or she said to the defense counsel and not if it is consistent what said in the hallway.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 10:55 pm
Justice Jackson, and the "Pathological Perspective" of the Free Exercise Clause, 65 Washington & Lee Law Review 1071-1089 (2008).Rene Reyes, Conscience Reexamined: Liberty, Equality, and the Legacy of Roger Williams, (Reviewing Martha C. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm by Joe Patrice
[Law Prof Blawg] * Professor Hasen examines Williams-Yulee. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 5:38 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Peter Margulies of Roger Williams Law School writes in with the following critique of the Latif decision and praise of Judge David Tatel’s dissent. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 9:11 am by John Culhane
(Even Venus Williams took such a break at this year’s Aussie Open, and I can’t recall seeing her do that before.) [read post]
18 May 2008, 9:43 pm
In 2008, can you imagine an advocate opening his argument with:   “May it please the Court, Miss Rogers, Associate Justices, Mr. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 2:43 am
Williams, 33 FLW 2319, 3rd DCA, other crimes, wrongs or acts, def charged with 3 separate armed robberies, and firearm expert determined that bullet casings removed form all 3 guns were forced from the same weapon, even though the robberies may not have been similar in nature can admit facts of robberies into each trial as there was witness identification for all the robberies, should be admitted to establish identity, test for admissibility is relevancy not necessityChamblin, 33 FLW 2353… [read post]