Search for: "Williams v. Eli Lilly and Company"
Results 21 - 26
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Thus, at best, Karl has just created a regime of redundant and overlapping liability with the patients stuck in the middle - not knowing whom to believe if doctors and drug companies say different things.The learned intermediary rule thus makes sound practical sense. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Where relevant, did s/he pay attention to the company's sales representatives or ignore them? [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm
We analyzed 120 companies: food/beverage, entertainment, etc. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 2009 WL 5216930, at *12 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:34 pm
A corporate defendant doesn't like to bet the company. [read post]
