Search for: "Williams v. Federal District Court" Results 1 - 20 of 3,639
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2024, 9:46 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Circuit Rejects Oil Company Attempt to Remove District's Climate Suit to Federal Court, Dec. 19, 2023; William Barr Responds on American Petroleum Institute v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld that ruling. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am by Fred Wertheimer
This claim was rejected by federal district court judge Tanya Chutkan in December 2023. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm by Amy Howe
” A federal district judge dismissed the charge under Section 1512(c)(2). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:40 am by Dennis Crouch
The Federal Circuit directed the district court on remand to holistically reevaluate the evidence of Laurain’s and Williams’ intent to deceive, in light of their seeming pattern of misconduct. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:02 am by Unknown
Ltd.).The jury’s verdict was delivered April 5 after a nine-day trial in federal district court in the Southern District of New York.In a statement, SEC Division of Enforcement Director Gurbir S. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
Initially, post-Daubert, federal courts were quick to excuse the absence of epidemiology for a novel claim. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 5:14 am by Guest Author
When the SEC brings a case to federal court, it is merely asking a court to apply the law as Congress wrote it. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am by admin
”[8] Many federal district and intermediate appellate courts responded by ignoring the language of Rule 702, by reverting to pre-Daubert precedent, or by inventing new standards and shifting the burden to the party challenging the expert witness opinion’s admissibility. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The bad news is that this change will address only the tip of the iceberg.For one thing, federal appeals courts, not just federal district courts, can and do issue broad rulings that necessitate expedited Supreme Court consideration. [read post]