Search for: "Williams v. Federal District Court" Results 101 - 120 of 3,629
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2012, 9:20 am by P.J. Blount
Supreme Court has issued a decision in Federal Aviation Administration v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 3:54 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(patent infringement case) Rob Williams v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
For example, some folks are hoping that the Court (in particular Justice Kennedy) will find a way in the Wisconsin districting case argued in October—Gill v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 9:44 am by H. Scott Leviant
U-Haul Co. of California (Sept. 16, 2016), the Second Appellate District, Division Seven, affirmed the trial Court's ruling that U-Haul could not assert an arbitration agreement to compel the plaintiffs to individually arbitrate whether they qualified as “aggrieved employee[s],” to determine in arbitration whether they had standing to pursue a PAGA claim.The Court agreed with Williams v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 9:02 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 132639 (ED CA, Sept. 27, 2016), a California federal district court dismissed a suit by a Muslim inmate challenging unclothed visual body cavity searches of Muslim inmates during Ramadan before they were allowed to attend religious programming.In Williams v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 8:55 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 784 (D NV, Jan. 3, 2019), a Nevada federal district court allowed a Wiccan inmate to move ahead with his complaint that he was denied religious items, religious oils and religious teas.In Williams v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 9:41 am
District Court Judge, Kathleen Williams, ruled cruise lines can be held civilly liable for their crewmembers' violation of the certain federal laws designed to protect children. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:00 am
(“RLR”) petitioned the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to vacate an arbitration award issued in favor of William Webb (“Webb”) on the grounds that the arbitrator acted in manifest disregard of the law. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:01 pm by Patent Docs
By Andrew Williams -- On Monday, the Federal Circuit issued an Order in the Novo Nordisk A/S v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
Oct. 3, 2008), the court (Judge William Alsup) wrote this about the CLRA's pre-filing notice requirement: California courts require "strict" compliance with Section 1782. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 8:38 am by Kenan Farrell
McKenna of Woodard Emhardt Moriarty McNett & Henry LLPDefendant: MR International LLCCause: Federal and Common Law Trademark Infringement, Unfair CompetitionCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge William T. [read post]