Search for: "Williams v. Rogers"
Results 1 - 20
of 746
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:00 am
Lee v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during February 2024 Nine consistory court judgments were circulated in 2024 including: Procedure Churchyards and burials Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials Also included are: Privy Council Business; Other legal issues; Visitations; CFCE Determinations; and Links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:52 am
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics bk. v, ch. 11, 1137b (Roger Crisp ed., 2000). [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
William H. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:10 pm
The case is Gates v. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 9:38 am
Note that I consulted with William Brewer, Sarah Rogers, and Noah Peters of Brewer Attorneys & Counselors on the petition, and look forward to consulting further with them and with Cole (with whom I've much enjoyed working in the past) on the merits briefs.The post NRA and ACLU Teaming up on the First Amendment in <i>NRA v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 8:39 am
This Comment argues that Congress should amend Section 114(b) of the Copyright Act to make clear that a de minimis defense is permitted for digital music sampling pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in VMG Salsoul, LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 8:37 am
This Comment argues that Congress should amend Section 114(b) of the Copyright Act to make clear that a de minimis defense is permitted for digital music sampling pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in VMG Salsoul, LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 8:37 am
This Comment argues that Congress should amend Section 114(b) of the Copyright Act to make clear that a de minimis defense is permitted for digital music sampling pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in VMG Salsoul, LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 8:36 am
This Comment argues that Congress should amend Section 114(b) of the Copyright Act to make clear that a de minimis defense is permitted for digital music sampling pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in VMG Salsoul, LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 8:35 am
This Comment argues that Congress should amend Section 114(b) of the Copyright Act to make clear that a de minimis defense is permitted for digital music sampling pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in VMG Salsoul, LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 8:30 am
This Comment argues that Congress should amend Section 114(b) of the Copyright Act to make clear that a de minimis defense is permitted for digital music sampling pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in VMG Salsoul, LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 11:22 am
Here's my post on the petition, from March, though you can read all the filings here: [* * *] William Brewer, Sarah Rogers & Noah Peters of Brewer Attorneys & Counselors and I filed a petition earlier this month asking the Supreme Court to review the Second Circuit decision in NRA v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:07 pm
Biden criticized the Supreme Court’s decision in Nebraska v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:30 am
Peter Margulies (Roger Williams University School of Law) has posted Borderline Ambiguity: Major Questions and Immigration Law on SSRN. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
Judge Katsas (joined by Judges Randolph and Rogers) succinctly captures the standing analysis with an analogy: In Optimal Wireless v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
Judge Katsas (joined by Judges Randolph and Rogers) succinctly captures the standing analysis with an analogy: In Optimal Wireless v. [read post]
