Search for: "Williams v. Sellers" Results 1 - 20 of 335
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2009, 6:05 am
” There is no binding duty of the seller’s conveyancing solicitor to complete Part II of the Property Info Questionnaire.It is due to this case of William Sindall Plc -v- Cambridgeshire and the statement by the Law Society that we at Fridays endeavor to ensure that where a seller completes a Sellers Property Information form that we ask the Seller’s lawyer to complete a Sellers Property Information Form Part II. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
First, an activist short-seller’s work product is an unreliable source of new information about an issuer because the short-seller has an economic interest in driving down the stock price. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:02 am
Manufacturer Not Liable for Seller's Alleged False Advertising of ProductsThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.Taiwanese bicycle component manufacturer Tien Hsin was not directly or vicariously liable under the Lanham Act or Washington law for allegedly false advertising by a separate corporation (FSA)—whose trademark was held by the manufacturer—that sold Tien Hsin's products to North American distributors and… [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 9:00 am by Lewis H. Lazarus
That is exactly what the Delaware Court of Chancery did in denying the plaintiff's request for specific performance in Williams Companies v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Williams at the expense of Walker-Thomas (Part IV and V). [read post]