Search for: "Williams v. Sellers"
Results 61 - 80
of 335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2015, 9:13 pm
On Tuesday afternoon local time, Judge William H. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am
Redbubble and others]….just because a seller is an online service does not mean they automatically escape liability…. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:52 am
Sunfrog * Online Marketplace Defeats Trademark Suit Because It’s Not the “Seller”–OSU v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:37 am
Sunfrog * Online Marketplace Defeats Trademark Suit Because It’s Not the “Seller”–OSU v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:27 am
Sunfrog * Online Marketplace Defeats Trademark Suit Because It’s Not the “Seller”–OSU v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:38 am
" Smith v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 5:43 am
October 5, 2009) (unpublished)*; Williams v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 7:43 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 6:43 pm
., United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:16 pm
Century 21 Top Realty; Throckmartin v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:20 pm
Placement of “Patent Pending” Tag Supports Competitor’s False Marking ClaimThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.The placement of “patent pending” label on the bottom of tote bags, next to the seller’s “Optari” label, could constitute false patent marking, the federal district court in Nashville has ruled. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:25 am
Jenack Estate Appraisers and Auctioneers v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 7:59 am
Attorneys for Nichols; William Jenner and Darrell Auxier both of Madison, IN. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 11:02 am
Sunfrog * Online Marketplace Defeats Trademark Suit Because It’s Not the “Seller”–OSU v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 10:14 am
The salon operators alleged facts sufficient to show that the false advertising claims were material to consumers’ purchasing decisions, the court concluded.The decision in Salon FAD v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
In Kellogg Co. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:31 pm
The case is Cariou v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:13 am
App. 1990), and Gasque v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
The report from William Coull fails to indicate that either he or the business was in fact properly licensed. [read post]
