Search for: "Willis Ball"
Results 21 - 40
of 169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2023, 12:12 pm
“The Conservative Justices Will Believe Any Story They Want to Hear; The Supreme Court’s docket is crowded with cases featuring dubious narratives, sock-puppet petitioners, and high-profile conservative activists”: Jay Willis has this essay online at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 5:34 pm
” Jay Willis has this essay online at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 7:22 pm
“The Wisconsin Supreme Court Election Was the Most Honest Election In America; Janet Protasiewicz was honest with voters about what it means to be a judge; They rewarded her for it”: Jay Willis has this post at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
4 May 2023, 5:55 pm
“Senate Democrats Are Giving the Supreme Court’s Corruption a Pass; The Clarence Thomas scandals are a golden political opportunity for Dick Durbin and his Democratic colleagues; They are blowing it”: Jay Willis has this post at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 9:25 am
And at Balls and Strikes, the current installment of Jay Willis’s weekly newsletter is titled “John Roberts Is Giving Up On His Longest-Running Lie. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 4:28 pm
” At Balls and Strikes, Jay Willis has this review of Justice Stephen G. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 5:52 pm
” Jay Willis has this post at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
11 Dec 2021, 7:48 am
Wade‘s days are numbered”: Jay Willis has this post at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:38 pm
“It Is Not a Journalist’s Job to Make John Roberts Look Good; Telling the whole story of a Supreme Court case requires more than reading the opinion and cranking out a summary by lunchtime”: Jay Willis has this post at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 1:12 pm
” Jay Willis has this post at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
” Jay Willis has this post at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 8:53 pm
“The Curious Case of the Mildly Annoyed Judge; Legal journalists often identify the party affiliation of a federal judge’s appointing president; Not everyone is thrilled about this”: Jay Willis has this essay online at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
“Republican Politicians Keep Learning That Abortion Is Popular and They Are Not; Florida Amendment 4 gives 22 million people the chance to protect abortion access over the strident objections of Republican elected officials”: Jay Willis has this essay online at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
4 May 2022, 2:48 pm
Hodges is safe; This claim does not hold up to even cursory scrutiny”: Lisa Needham has this post at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:55 pm
“The Next Attack on Medication Abortion Just Has to Be a Little Less Stupid; When conservative activists control the federal bench, bad people who make worse arguments are going to win more often than they might otherwise expect”: Jay Willis has this essay online at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:44 pm
“Conservative Activists Are Ready to Bury Federal Courts In Paperwork; While the Supreme Court decides whether to get rid of Chevron deference once and for all, overworked trial court judges are already preparing for the worst”: Jay Willis has this post at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 2:08 pm
“Just Call Supreme Court Justices ‘Republicans’ and ‘Democrats’; Judges love talking publicly about how they do law, not politics; Journalists don’t need to tell this fairy tale any longer”: Jay Willis has this post at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 8:45 pm
“Caring About ‘Fairness’ Is a Political Choice; The Supreme Court’s conservatives have spent their careers disclaiming the relevance of ‘fairness’ in legal analysis; Now, though, a Democratic president is trying to do something they don’t like”: Jay Willis has this post at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 11:26 am
” Jay Willis has this post at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
“There Is No Such Thing As a ‘Quiet’ Supreme Court Term; When conservatives have this much control over the Court’s agenda, the only question for liberals is how much they will lose, and how quickly”: Jay Willis has this post at Balls and Strikes. [read post]