Search for: "Winke v. Winke"
Results 41 - 60
of 226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2012, 5:12 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 609(b) provides that This subdivision (b) applies if more than 10 years have passed since the witness’s conviction or release from confinement for it, whichever is later. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 9:58 am
Because the State could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the shackling did not contribute to the verdict - the standard under the US Supreme Court's ruling in Deck v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 1:33 pm
Supreme Court of Ohio: City of Barberton v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 1:33 pm
Supreme Court of Ohio: City of Barberton v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 3:33 am
But my personal opinion is that when (1) a police officer volunteers to a roommate that the officer can't search the defendant's room because there's no probable cause -- nudge nudge, wink wink -- and; (2) the roommate responds by getting the "crazy idea" (from I wonder where) that maybe the roomate should search the defendant's room himself and give the evidence to the police; and (3) asks the police officer if he can do so, to which the officer… [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 1:48 pm
In a 62-page ruling issued Friday about the case, the court said that with a "wink-wink" and a "nod-nod," Family Court Judge Eleanore Garber and lawyers for a lesbian couple ignored those laws. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 7:34 am
Wink, wind, nod, nod....) [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:06 pm
It is a campy piece featuring gyrating butts in tight pants and wink-wink references to anal sex. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 12:58 pm
He didn't just wink and nod, he actually tried to shake people down, according to the wiretaps.Governor Blagojevich was tacky in playing the game. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
The opinion in Farris v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:56 pm
His point was that society descends into barbarism when people abandon what’s right in favor of self-gratification at the expense of others; when lying, cheating, or stealing are “winked at” instead of shunned. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:10 am
From Lenz v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:25 am
DeLara, 353 Md. 509, 727 A.2d 930 (1999), and Falik v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:36 pm
’” [@ScottKGraham on dissent in Starr v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
In Washington v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 4:59 pm
Complying with the Supreme Court's dictates in Brady v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:21 am
Other coverage of the Court’s decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 7:57 am
Today, the Court issued a very helpful opinion in the case of Ayers v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
The morning the ECJ delivered its judgment in L'Oreal v Bellure, on whether 'knock off' imitation perfumes which clearly weren't the trade marked goods, but were marketed in a way that 'winked at' L'Oreal's famous perfume brands, infringed L'Oreal's trade marks and were protected as permissible comparative advertising.Is harm needed for unfair advantage? [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 1:58 am
Intellectual property enthusiasts will recall his rulings in Polydor Ltd v Brown [2005] EWHC 3191 (Ch): ignorance no defence to copyright infringement action in respect of connecting a computer to the internet so that others could access audio files; Sawyer v Atari Interactive Inc [2005] EWHC 2351 (Ch) - English courts had jurisdiction to hear software dispute even though claim served in US; General Cigar Co v Partagas [2005] EWHC 1729 (Ch), the nightmare… [read post]
