Search for: "Wise v. Davis" Results 41 - 60 of 140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2010, 7:50 am by Jay Willis
In nomination-related news, Julie Hirschfield Davis of the AP reviews Kagan’s “carefully calculated hints about her judicial approach” on various issues, including the Citizens United v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 5:45 am by Lawrence Solum
Supreme Court decisions is Dred Scott v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 7:17 am by Rachel, Law Clerk and Office Manager
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter:Hill media fight over harassment policy, some say it could destroy Parliamentary Press GalleryNon-Competition Provision Results In Increased Notice Period By BC CourtConrad Black permanently banned as director or officer of any Ontario public company 100 academics urge major changes to ‘dangerous’ anti-terrorism billUS Navy judge lifts order banning female guards from touching Guantanamo interneesCanada’s… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:50 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
Estate of Davis, South Florida Injury Lawyer Blawg, June 18, 2015 Right to Privacy in Florida Injury Case – Muller v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 6:33 am by Jon Hyman
Wage & Hour Financial Service Workers May Be Glorified "Production Workers" Who Are Entitled to Overtime -- Davis v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) AAA v Associated Newspapers heard 17 to 20, 25 and 26 June 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Desmond v Foreman, heard 2 to 3 July 2012 (Tugendhat J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:03 am by Larry Tolchinsky
Davis, 699 So. 2d 999, 1001-02 (Fla. 1997). [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Set Aside Time For Just Thinking About the Material: When I was in full-time legal practice, a wise partner and mentor lamented that the standard time sheets that lawyers use for recording how they spend their time, so that clients can receive some detail along with their bills, contained categories for many lawyerly tasks—such as researching, drafting, editing, sending emails, and participating in conferences and telephone conversations—but did not contain a standard category… [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 9:00 pm
The Court further clarified the meaning of 'testimonial' in Davis v. [read post]