Search for: "Wolpoff & Abramson"
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2008, 4:34 pm
Some of the companies and attorneys that are filing these suits include but are not limited to Wolpoff & Abramson, Harrison Ross Byck, Esq., P.C., Apothaker & Associates, P.C., Capitol One, MBNA, NCO, CACH, LLC, and Patenaude & Felix, A.P.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 4:25 pm
Some of the companies and attorneys that are filing these suits include but are not limited to Wolpoff & Abramson, Harrison Ross Byck, Esq., P.C., Apothaker & Associates, P.C., Capitol One, MBNA, NCO, CACH, LLC, and Patenaude & Felix, A.P.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 2:39 pm
This includes any lawsuit filed by Wolpoff & Abramson. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 12:18 pm
Wolpoff and Abramson, No. 07-12016, by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, the court rejected Wolpoff and Abramson's argument that the Ms. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 9:56 am
Wolpoff & Abramson, 485 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2007), with Kropelnicki v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 10:27 am
Wolpoff & Abramson, 485 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2007), answering yes, with Guerrero v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 4:57 am
Wolpoff & Abramson, No. 06-1458, that a debt collection law firm was not immune from suit under FDCPA claims of wrongful debt collection action. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:19 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit just decided Sayyed v Wolpoff and Abramson. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:19 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit just decided Sayyed v Wolpoff and Abramson. [read post]
10 May 2007, 10:59 am
Wolpoff & Abramson, the Fourth Circuit in an opinion by Judge Wilkinson, joined by Chief Judge Wilkins and Judge Motz, reversed the order of the district court granting the defendant law firm's motion to dismiss the plaintiff's claims brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. [read post]
10 May 2007, 6:09 am
Wolpoff & Abramson, No. 06-1458 (May 9, 2007), the Fourth Circuit rejected a debt-collection law firm's argument that it enjoys common-law immunity from FDCPA claims that arise out of statements made in the course of litigation. [read post]
10 May 2007, 4:37 am
WOLPOFF & ABRAMSON, the Fourth Circuit dealt with the issue whether law firms are immune to claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act because an alleged absolute common law immunity attaches to any statements made during the course of judicial proceedings. [read post]
9 May 2007, 2:27 pm
Wolpoff & Abramson, No. 06-1458 (May 9, 2007), the Fourth Circuit rejected a debt-collection law firm's argument that it enjoys common-law immunity from FDCPA claims that arise out of statements made in the course of litigation. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 2:32 am
Wolpoff & Abramson LLP U.S. [read post]
