Search for: "Worthy v. Social Security Administration"
Results 61 - 80
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
Ballard, 266 Ga. 408 (2), 467 S.E.2d 891 (1996); Worthy v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
The landmark ruling in Gideon v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 3:16 pm
The Social Security Administration denied the benefits, finding that the wife had not shown the child was the donor’s “child” as defined by the Social Security Act. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 2:35 pm
Ballard, 266 Ga. 408 (2), 467 S.E.2d 891 (1996); Worthy v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:50 pm
The High Court also ruled that the action of the University was administratively unreasonable. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:00 am
The Social Security Administration denied the application, reading the act to entitle biological children to benefits only if they were qualified to inherit as a decedent under state intestacy law. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:00 am
” The Social Security Administration denied the application, reading the act to entitle biological children to benefits only if they were qualified to inherit as a decedent under state intestacy law. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 11:09 am
As a result of the 1973 case Gagnon v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 1:55 pm
INS, 667 F.2d 771 (1981); Lauvik v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:22 am
It would cause administrative chaos, and would inevitably have significant economic implications, if the regulations were now to be quashed. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
There are a number of resolved complaints since last week, including the Met Office v The Daily Telegraph (over the accuracy of claims about the Met’s ability to predict the weather); Richard Ottaway MP v The Daily Telegraph (clause 1, accuracy) and the British Association of Social Workers v Community Care (clause 1, accuracy). [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
The Administrative Court dismissed Dr Naik’s application for judicial review of this decision, holding that the Secretary of State’s responsibility for the protection of national security is a central constitutional role, and encompasses a duty owed to the public at large. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am
We must question whether it is even a worthy goal to obtain, because if we legitimised all points of view we default on the responsibility of a free society to protect those freedoms. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:25 am
Weiner v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:04 am
Ordinarily such cases are not safe guides in the administration of the law. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:51 pm
Meanwhile, the amount of money we've promised to spend on programs like Social Security and Medicare -- money we don't have -- is about $52 trillion. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am
The day a new Republican administration takes charge, I would predict that a whole series of things will soon start being characterized as criminal, as violations of international law, and as worthy of attention by prosecutors in Spain and international forums. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Take, for example, last week’s oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Salazar v. [read post]
