Search for: "Wyeth Ayerst Pharmaceuticals Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm by Bexis
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2004)), with jurisdiction over Michigan – yet another court out of New York now presumes to know New Jersey law better than the New Jersey courts (McDarby v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Wyeth, Inc., 37 A.3d 549, 570 (New Jersey Super. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2008 WL 7136137 (Ala. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm by Bexis
Ayerst Laboratories, Inc., 607 P.2d 1339, 1349-50 (Kan. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 1999 WL 33548540, at *1 (S.D. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Wyeth-Ayerst Labs., 385 F.3d 961, 966 (6th Cir. 2004) (holding that a drug manufacturer is immune from suit unless “the FDA itself determines that a fraud has been committed on the agency during the regulatory-approval process”) citing Buckman Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2004), and Desiano v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:40 pm by Bexis
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 1996 WL 784566 (N.D. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:53 pm
Wyeth-Ayerst Labs., 82 S.W.3d 849, 857 (Ky. 2002); Hinton v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 1994 WL 532091, at *1 (E.D. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 2:56 am by Bexis
Wyeth-Ayerst LaboratoriesBoth Garcia and Desiano involved the "fraud on the FDA" exception to a Michigan tort reform statute that imposes a presumption of adequacy on warnings that are FDA approved - that is, just about every warning. [read post]