Search for: "Wyeth Holdings LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., 278 F.Supp.2d 684, 700 (W.D.N.C. 2003) (expert witnesses may not opine about corporate intent and motive) (barring Dr. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
Wyeth LLC, IP High Court Case No. 2020 (Gyo-Ke) 10015; Decision date: May 17, 2021) filed by Merck Sharp & Dohme (“MSD”) as an appeal from a JPO trial decision holding Wyeth’s patent valid. [read post]
Wyeth LLC, IP High Court Case No. 2020 (Gyo-Ke) 10015; Decision date: May 17, 2021) filed by Merck Sharp & Dohme (“MSD”) as an appeal from a JPO trial decision holding Wyeth’s patent valid. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
In one Fen-Phen case, one plaintiff sought to retain an expert witness previously retained by Wyeth to testify about the same diet drug (fenfluramine) in a case brought by a different plaintiff. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:55 am by Jon L. Gelman
McCabe today announced the filing of two lawsuits to compel the clean-up of contamination and recover Natural Resource Damages (NRDs).The first suit is against Solvay Specialty Polymers USA, LLC and Arkema Inc., two companies responsible for widespread contamination from toxic per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)  emanating from a Gloucester County facility, which has contaminated public drinking water in the region. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
An expert who ignored studies was excluded by the district court, but the Court of Appeals found an abuse of discretion, holding that the sufficiency of an expert’s basis is a question of weight and not admissibility.[13] These rulings elevate form over substance by halting the gatekeeping inquiry at an irrelevant, high level of abstraction, and finding that the challenged expert witness was doing something “sciencey,” which is good enough for government work. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:02 am
Wyeth LLC, 562 U.S. 223 (2011) − there hasn’t been many developments on comment k beyond occasional cases. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
The iconic Hunger Games line, “may the odds be ever in your favor” pretty much sums up how we feel about our top ten best decisions of 2015. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
The Lipitor court’s holding built on the ruling by Judge Breyer’s treatment of dose in In re Bextra & Celebrex Mktg. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Back in 2009 – when the blog was still a Bexis/Herrmann operation – we wrote a catch-all punitive damages post entitled (oddly enough) “On Punitive Damages. [read post]
21 May 2015, 1:09 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
   Second, the Court rejected an almost identical pre-approval argument in Wyeth v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 3:26 pm by James Galvin
., Inc. 902619386 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to General Electric Company 902619394 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Exxon Mobil Corp. 902619493 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Texas Instruments Inc 902619519 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Amgen Inc. 902619527 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Goldcorp Inc. 902619535 UBS Yield… [read post]