Search for: "Wyeth Holdings LLC" Results 61 - 80 of 112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm by Bexis
APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC, 2010 WL 4941451, at *4 (D.N.J. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:00 am by Josh Myers
Myers is the owner and President of Myers Injury Law, LLC and a founding partner of Schultz & Myers, LLC. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:38 pm by Matt C. Bailey
Therefore, although I adhere to my views on purposes-and-objectives pre-emption, see Wyeth v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 Obviously, if we’re calling California conservative and Idaho liberal, then the issues associated with comment k don’t fit well into the usual legal cubby holes.Idaho, then – holding our noses all the way. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:08 am by Bexis
  We of course like preemption, but after our side lost Wyeth v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Bexis
We’re always open to flattery, and it’s flattering to us when somebody thinks that we provide the best legal research available (at least without a prescription). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
Actavis Totowa, LLC, 2010 WL 3604674, at *3-4 (S.D. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:40 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Wyeth LLC from the likes of Kelly Savage, Max Kennerly, Russell Jackson and David Oliver. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by Bexis
Dow Agrosciences LLC, 544 U.S. 431 (2005), a non-FDCA case involving violation claims under a different statute. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 4:22 am by Kelly
General Update on the Indo-E.U. trade dispute before the WTO (Spicy IP) Australia: Proceedings in other jurisdictions no excuse for delay: Wyeth v The Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology (Patentology) EU: Positive opinions on Paediatric Investigation Plans (The SPC Blog) EU: Guidelines for biosimilar antibodies in Europe due in November (Patent Docs) Netherlands: Court of Appeal of The Hague dismisses request to suspend execution of judgment in first instance: Sandoz v Leo Pharmaceutical… [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm by Bexis
  To get on this list the court has to hold that there is no separate duty to test apart from well-established product liability claims for warning, design, or (maybe) manufacturing defect.West v. [read post]