Search for: "Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. " Results 1 - 20 of 517
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2024, 6:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 616 F.3d 134 (2d Cir. 2010), that a plaintiff is not required to prove the employer's articulated reason is false, and that the the plaintiff can prevail by showing that an unlawful factor (like sex, race, etc.) was a motivating factor, even "without proving that the employer's proffered explanation was not some part of the employer's motivation. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009) Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm by admin
 Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 788 F. 2d 741, 744–745 (11th Cir. 1986). [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
Risk assessments would seemingly be about assessing risks, but they are not. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:03 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 592 n.10 (1993). [3]  Id., citing Bourjaily v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 6:18 am by Elizabeth McCuskey
They can be “subsumed within an already tightly circumscribed legal analysis,” as the court recently explained in the patent-construction context in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 2:29 pm by Sarah Aberg and Bochan Kim
Martoma’s portfolio included two pharmaceutical companies, Elan Corporation, plc (“Elan”) and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 2:29 pm by Sarah Aberg and Bochan Kim
Martoma’s portfolio included two pharmaceutical companies, Elan Corporation, plc (“Elan”) and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 11:12 am by Tom Lamb
Its ruling is the latest in a series of plaintiff-friendly decisions that misconstrued the Supreme Court’s landmark 2009 ruling in Wyeth Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:02 am by Dean Freeman
Wyeth Inc., in ruling in 2008 that the maker of a drug called Reglan could be liable to a plaintiff who used the generic version.The state supreme court declined to hear the Conte case, so this will be the first time that court will consider a challenge like this. [read post]