Search for: "York v. Lambert" Results 1 - 20 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2007, 7:57 am
We've been asked two questions repeatedly since the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:01 am by charonqc
Jane Lambert Barrister NIPC Law blog On 30 Oct 2007 the Legal Services Act received Royal Assent. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:30 pm by Karen Tani
New from New York University Press: Unclean Lips: Obscenity, Jews, and American Culture (Nov. 2013), by Josh Lambert (Yiddish Book Center/University of Massachusetts, Amherst). [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
On Tuesday, the Court granted certiorari in No. 06-1498, Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 4:59 am
Warner-Lambert, 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2006) (which became Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:42 pm
As the whole drug and device world knows by now, Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 11:00 pm
When the New York County Supreme Court granted that relief, and ordered a “change of venue,” DM appealed.The Appellate Division, First Department, thought it was an error to grant Lambert’s request because the latter’s corporate documents listed New York County as the location of its principal office (even though the company wasn’t physically present there). [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:01 am
The federal preemption of state tort law is an issue in several cases on the Supreme Court's docket, including February 25 oral arguments in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:08 am
Karp, partners at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, discuss ReliaStar Life Insurance Company of New York v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm by Bexis
Warner–Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2007), presumed to know more about Michigan law than either the Michigan courts (Taylor v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:10 pm by Will
Most notoriously, the Supreme Court fought this issue to a 4-4 draw back in 2008 (in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
Lambert, which involves the timeliness of an appeal from a denial of class-action certification. [read post]