Search for: "Youtube, Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 1,742
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2007, 9:49 pm
Google, Inc., 412 F.Supp. 2d 1106 (D. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:53 pm by Doug
Pakistan, home to the world’s second- largest Muslim population, blocked Google Inc. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 3:31 am
- pdf Media mogul Sumner Redstone has had a love-hate affair with YouTube Inc. this week. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 8:06 am by Eric Goldman
Case Citation: In re: DMCA Section 512(h) Subpoena to YOUTUBE (GOOGLE, INC.), 2022 WL 160270 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 1:11 pm
The bulls-eye on YouTube's back will probably grow after the Web site is acquired by Internet giant Google Inc. for $1.65 billion. [read post]
7 May 2007, 5:53 am
NBC Universal sides against YouTube in piracy suit — pdf NBC Universal is taking sides with fellow media conglomerate Viacom Inc. over a piracy lawsuit filed against Google Inc. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 2:00 pm by Doug Isenberg
YouTube, the video website owned by Google Inc, said it would not remove a film clip mocking the Islamic Prophet Muhammad that has been blamed for anti-U.S. protests in Egypt and Libya, but it has blocked access to it in those countries. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 6:25 am by Chris Castle
Recently, The Wall Street Journal reported that Alphabet Inc., the parent company of Google and YouTube, has designed Google Search to specifically give preference to YouTube and other Google-owned video service providers.1 There is no public insight into how Google designs its algorithms, which seem to deliver up preferential search results for YouTube and other Google video products ahead of other competitive services. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 8:17 am by Eric Goldman
This circular logic reminded me a little of one of my least-favorite trademark cases of all time, the SMJ Group, Inc. v. 417 Lafayette Restaurant case. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Hulu and YouTube were eventually dismissed from the case. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:14 am
Fort Wayne, IN - Trademark lawyers for 80/20, Inc. of Columbia City, Indiana filed a trademark infringement suit in the Northern District of Indianaalleging Parco Inc of Huntertown, Indiana and Phillip Andrew Roser of Fort Wayne, Indiana infringed trademark registration no. 2,699,302 for the mark 80/20 and no. 3,362,571 for the mark AUTO QUOTER registered by the US Trademark Office as well as three unregistered trademarks. 80/20 also alleges Parco has infringed five registered… [read post]