Search for: "ZB"
Results 61 - 80
of 170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2018, 1:01 pm
An identical disclosure requires that the skilled person can take the claimed technical teaching „directly and unambiguously“ from the original application documents (FCJ, Judgment of 11 September 2001, X ZR 168/98 – Luftverteiler; FCJ, Judgment of 8 July 2010, Xa ZR 125/07 – Fälschungssicheres Dokument; FCJ, Judgment of 14 August 2012, X ZR 3/10 – UV-unempfindliche Druckplatte) as a possible embodiment of the invention (FCJ, Decision of 11 September 2001, X… [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm
There were reports of the decision in the Newsroom and Newstalk ZB. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 6:54 am
The incorporation of a feature according to which the claimed composition must not contain a certain substance is not necessarily an unallowable extension (delimiting from FCJ X ZB 75/08 Reifenabdichtmittel). [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 5:29 am
Börner: News on the competence-competence of arbitral panels under German law – Simultaneously a note on the Federal High Court decision of August 9, 2016, I ZB 1/15 The Federal Court of Justice of Germany has decided that the arbitration clause even survives the insolvency of a party (severability), unless stipulated to the contrary or in case of the existence of reasons for the nullity or termination of the arbitral agreement, such reasons either existing separately or… [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:42 pm
Functionality and Scope of Protection by edited by Chris Carani€ 199 The post Germany: Raltegravir, Federal Court of Justice of Germany, X ZB 2/17, 11 July 2017 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 10:44 am
X ZB 2/17, link). [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 3:40 am
We've Moved! [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:30 pm
The latest issue of the “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax)” features the following articles: U. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 3:04 am
Finally, the Fahrzeugscheibe II decision also confirms the FCJ’s long-standing case law stipulating that intermediate generalizations are in principle admissible (X ZR 107/12 Kommunikationskanal) unless it is clear from the application as filed that certain features of a working example are inseparable, with the claim having been amended so as to only contain some of them (X ZB 18/00 Drehmomentenübertragungseinrichtung). [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:47 am
I ZB 2/15, requested the Court of Justice of the European Union to give a ruling on the validity of arbitration agreements in BITs between Member States of the European Union, in particular in light of Articles 344, 267 and 18 I TFEU. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 1:56 pm
Southern Pacific Mortgage Ltd v V [2015] EW Misc B42 (CC) (19 November 2015) This is county court case, but a very interesting one on the issue of disability discrimination in mortgage possession proceedings. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:41 am
Nach §§ 97, 101, 20 InsO ist der Geschäftsführer einer GmbH verpflichtet, dem Insolvenzgericht, dem Insolvenzverwalter, dem Gläubigerausschuss und u. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:41 am
Nach §§ 97, 101, 20 InsO ist der Geschäftsführer einer GmbH verpflichtet, dem Insolvenzgericht, dem Insolvenzverwalter, dem Gläubigerausschuss und u. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:41 am
Nach §§ 97, 101, 20 InsO ist der Geschäftsführer einer GmbH verpflichtet, dem Insolvenzgericht, dem Insolvenzverwalter, dem Gläubigerausschuss und u. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:00 pm
By Dina Reis, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg (Germany) In its ruling of 10 December 2014 (Case XII ZB 463/13), the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof – BGH) had to decide whether, despite the domestic prohibition of surrogacy, a foreign judgment granting legal parenthood to the intended parents of a child born as a result of a surrogacy arrangement should be recognized. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
The ruling’s reference is I ZB 64/13 of 22 May 2014, and the acronym at stake was "ECR-Award", registered for services in classes 41. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:01 pm
A recently published decision by the German Federal Supreme Court (BGH) concerning the registrability of acronyms as trade marks (case reference I ZB 64/13, "ECR-Award", of 22 May 2014, see here in PDF) was quite widely reported (here, here, here) by German legal commentators since it indicates that the highest German court in civil matters is more generous than both the DPMA and the German Federal Patent Court when it comes to deciding on the… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:46 am
The government also noted that the Cleartron ZB-103’s MSDS states that it is harmful to aquatic life. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:46 am
The government also noted that the Cleartron ZB-103’s MSDS states that it is harmful to aquatic life. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:52 am
Unsuccessful in the first and second instances, this action is currently also pending at the BGH but has so far not been decided; (case reference I ZB 61/13). [read post]
