Search for: "Zimmer Holdings Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 2:01 pm by Brenda Fulmer
July 25th - Judge Katz will hold a status conference for the DePuy ASR MDL. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 2:01 pm by Brenda Fulmer
July 25th - Judge Katz will hold a status conference for the DePuy ASR MDL. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 2:01 pm by Brenda Fulmer
July 25th - Judge Katz will hold a status conference for the DePuy ASR MDL. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am by Bexis
Zimmer Holdings, Inc., 2010 WL 2696467, at *14 (W.D. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:22 pm by Bexis
Zimmer Holdings, Inc., 2011 WL 5509420, at *4 (W.D. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:29 am
Manufacturers of the devices include Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Zimmer Holdings Inc. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:46 am by ParkerMcDonald
The decision to hold a committee meeting comes almost a year after the FDA issued 145 orders for post market surveillance studies to 21 manufacturers of metal-on-metal hip systems, including Zimmer Holdings, DePuy, Wright Medical, Biomet, and Smith & Nephew. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:34 am by ParkerMcDonald
The decision to hold a committee meeting comes almost a year after the FDA issued 145 orders for post market surveillance studies to 21 manufacturers of metal-on-metal hip systems, including Zimmer Holdings, DePuy, Wright Medical, Biomet, and Smith & Nephew. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
Nash Oil & Gas, Inc., 526 F.3d 626, 631 (10th Cir. 2008) (quoting and applying Phelan); Orr v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm by Bexis
Zimmer Holdings, Inc., 2011 WL 5509420, at *4 (W.D. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 11:24 pm
Zimmer, Inc.Court: U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-2212  October 18, 2011 Judge: SYKES Areas of Law: Labor & Employment Law In 2004 plaintiff began working with a new supervisor,who removed many of plaintiff's job duties because he thought plaintiff, age 57, was too old. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 6:49 am
“The mere presence of [other safety devices] somewhere at the work site” does not satisfy defendant’s duty to provide appropriate safety devices (Zimmer v Chemung County Performing Arts, 65 NY2d 513, 524, rearg denied 65 NY2d 1054; see Williams v City of Niagara Falls, 43 AD3d 1426; Whiting v Dave Hennig, Inc., 28 AD3d 1105, 1106). [read post]