Search for: "adidas AG" Results 21 - 40 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2008, 4:41 pm
Adidas AG et al v. 2690942 Canada Inc. c.o.b. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 5:29 am
In a dispute that concerns all stripe-wearing kats, Case C-102/07 is a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden in the exciting contest of Adidas AG and Adidas Benelux BV v Marca Mode, C&A Nederland, H&M Hennes & Mauritz Netherlands BV and Vendex KBB Nederland BV. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 3:05 pm
I’m sure that any latent sense of inadequacy I might still harbor at age 47 is likely attributable to this fashion shortcoming 36 years ago. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Earlier this month, Adidas AG and Adidas Canada Ltd. filed a claim against Collective Brand Inc. in Federal Court. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm by war
Adidas AG v Pacific Brands Footwear Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1205 x [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 1:33 pm by Nikki Siesel
The Christian Faith Fellowship Church (the “Church” or “Appellant”) takes on Goliath, Adidas AG, the apparel giant (“Adidas” or the “Appellee”). [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 1:33 pm by Nikki Siesel
The Christian Faith Fellowship Church (the “Church” or “Appellant”) takes on Goliath, Adidas AG, the apparel giant (“Adidas” or the “Appellee”). [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 12:19 pm by Dennis Crouch
., No. 20-769 (Standard of review when appealing an issue decided on summary judgment that later served as the basis for an inequitable conduct finding). adidas AG v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:41 am
Adidas AG ("Adidas"), filed a patent infringement action against Under Armour, Inc. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 1:21 pm by Gene Quinn
Adidas AG, relating to an appeal from the inter partes review (IPR) of U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:42 pm by Stan
Chinese suppliers are calling on the clothes manufacturer Adidas AG to compensate them for the consequences of its decision to close the last factory it wholly owns on the mainland, saying that they might otherwise turn to the courts for assistance. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 12:34 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 103.Specifically, Nike asserts that the Board violated the noticeprovisions of the APA by finding that a limitation of substitute claim 49 was well-known in the art based on a priorart reference that, while in the record, was never cited byadidas AG (“Adidas”) for disclosing that limitation. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 3:58 am
*Now who's going to promote the Adidas tracksuit?! [read post]