Search for: "party test"
Results 61 - 80
of 36,555
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2018, 6:29 am
Genetic testing can be a crucial part of a child support proceeding when one party disputes paternity. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:23 pm
Car accidents can occur in a number of situations, and the negligent party such as the one driving recklessly or under influence is held liable for the crash. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:11 am
A party’s refusal to submit to the tests is admissible in evidence in any proceeding to determine paternity. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:02 am
In most cases, the injured party will not need to prove that the manufacturer was negligent; however, an injured party will need to prove that the product was unreasonably dangerous. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 1:09 pm
The announcement of the nuclear test was included in a short statement saying that the test was ordered directly by Kim Jong Un “on behalf of” the Korean Workers Party Central Committee. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 9:07 pm
By creating a digital record of DNA testing, immigration authorities risk disclosing private information to non-state third parties, contribute to racist practices in immigration law, and disregard immigrants’ lived experiences, Kritzman-Amir argues. [read post]
30 May 2012, 9:37 pm
In this way, as Sir Rupert said, disproportionate costs, whether necessarily or reasonably incurred, should not be recoverable from the paying party. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 10:14 am
An ambulance took you and the other party to the hospital. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 12:02 pm
A court will not allow a parent to ignore court-ordered paternity testing and may fine or sentence the no-show party. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 2:16 am
The Court of Appeals reversed the Appellate Division’s decision noting that the parties agreed that a public agency may lawfully order an employee to submit to a drug test on reasonable suspicion of drug use.The Court of Appeals found that the hearing officer concluded that the White Plains had reasonable suspicion to conduct the test, holding that the Appellate Division erred in concluding otherwise. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:16 am
These represent some of the reasons the refusal to disclose the details of the test sets is frustrating to parties. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 4:00 pm
Une partie seulement de la revendication 2 d'origine avait été incorporée à la revendication 1.Les parties, appliquant le test dit "du caractère essentiel", aussi appelé "test en 3 points", n'étaient pas d'accord quant à la conformité de la modification au regard de l'article 123(2) CBE.La Chambre rappelle que ces tests ne remplacent pas le "gold… [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:20 am
Deutsche Bank, testing whether Congress has authority to subpoena the President's financial records from third-party custodians of... [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 10:21 am
Sometimes during a child custody dispute, the court may decide that is needs additional information about the parties in order to determine what sort of custody arrangement is in the best interest of the parties' children. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 10:21 am
Sometimes during a child custody dispute, the court may decide that is needs additional information about the parties in order to determine what sort of custody arrangement is in the best interest of the parties' children. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:57 pm
See § 742.12(2) (requiring a sworn statement or declaration under penalty of perjury alleging paternity and setting forth facts establishing a reasonable possibility of the requisite sexual contact between the parties as a perquisite to obtaining an order for scientific testing). [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
The worker testified that he attended a party, where he got into an argument with an acquaintance. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:00 pm
Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court held that to determine whether an entity jointly employs an individual for purposes of the state’s minimum wage and overtime laws, courts should apply the Fair Labor Standards Act’s test, which considers the totality of the circumstances of the parties’ working relationship. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:00 pm
Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court held that to determine whether an entity jointly employs an individual for purposes of the state’s minimum wage and overtime laws, courts should apply the Fair Labor Standards Act’s test, which considers the totality of the circumstances of the parties’ working relationship. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:00 pm
Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court held that to determine whether an entity jointly employs an individual for purposes of the state’s minimum wage and overtime laws, courts should apply the Fair Labor Standards Act’s test, which considers the totality of the circumstances of the parties’ working relationship. [read post]
