Search for: "v. Bank of America, N.A." Results 1 - 20 of 314
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Bank of America, N.A., and remanded it back to the Second Circuit and instructed the appellate court to analyze whether New York’s law requiring interest to be paid on mortgage escrow accounts is preempted under the Dodd-Frank Act by applying the Barnett Bank standard.... [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Bank of America, N.A. subsequently acquired Countrywide Bank, N.A. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
    OCC’s Letter on Uniform Federal Banking Standards On November 9, 2023, the General Counsel of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”) issued a letter to the CEOs of all national banks and federal savings associations (“FSAs”) addressing uniform federal banking standards.[13] In the letter, the OCC explains that it is aware that some states have passed laws or taken other actions that “purport to… [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 9:15 am
Bank of America, N.A. (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 1489, 1505, fn. 11; Giraldo v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 6:41 am by Reid F. Herlihy
Bank of America, N.A., involving National Bank Act (NBA) preemption of New York’s law requiring that interest be paid to consumers on mortgage escrow account funds. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Bank of America, require banks to pay at least 2% interest annually on escrow accounts associated with residential mortgages. [read post]
Bank of America, N.A. in which it argues that a prepaid card loaded with pandemic-related unemployment benefits is a “prepaid account” subject to Regulation E, including its error resolution requirements ... [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 6:25 am by Unreported Opinions
In 2019, the property was sold at a public auction to Bank of America, N.A. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In those actions, which have been dismissed, plaintiff alleged that he was not compensated for his "unique work product," which allegedly resulted in $2 billion in "unprecedented transactions" between the Brazilian states and Bank of America. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In those actions, which have been dismissed, plaintiff alleged that he was not compensated for his "unique work product," which allegedly resulted in $2 billion in "unprecedented transactions" between the Brazilian states and Bank of America. [read post]