Search for: "v. Clark" Results 41 - 60 of 6,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2019, 8:08 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Evidence of flight A jury, in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, convicted Marcus Clark, appellant, of two counts of second-degree assault and one count of malicious destruction of property. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 10:38 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Gun possession by convicted felon On November 15, 2017, appellant, Anthony Jerome Clark Jr., was convicted by a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of possession of a regulated firearm after having been convicted of a disqualifying crime. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 7:26 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Possession of marijuana and PCP Convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court of Prince George’s County, Maryland, of possession of phencyclidine (PCP) and marijuana, appellant, Dante Clark, presents the following question for our review: Was the evidence sufficient to support Appellant’s conviction for possession of marijuana ... [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 10:39 am by scanner1
CLARK, Petitioners and Appellants, and BILL AND KATY MARTIN, Respondents and Appellees. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:41 am by scanner1
CLARK, RALPH HAMLER, individually and as agent of Madison County, and MADISON COUNTY, a subdivision of the State of Montana, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 8:32 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Impeachment — Non-testifying witness Following a jury trial1 in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Anthony Clark, Jr., was convicted of second-degree murder, attempted second-degree murder, and two firearm offenses relating to a shooting that resulted in the death of a 13-year old boy and serious injury to an adult male.2 Clark ... [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:44 am by Amy Howe
The first opinion this morning came in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:13 am
Horsham Properties Group Ltd v Clark and Another Chancery Division “The exercise of a statutory power of sale under section 101 of the Law of Property Act 1925 was not a deprivation of possessions for the purposes of article 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights, protecting the right to property. [read post]