Posts tagged with: "132"
Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2013, 7:50 am by emagraken
Adding to this site’s archived cases discussing fault for pedestrian collisions, reasons for judgement were released recently addressing contributory negligence of a pedestrian struck in a marked crosswalk. In the recent case (Bulatovic v. Siebert) the Plaintiff was struck while crossing Granville Avenue in Vancouver.  She had passed the midway point of the street when struck by the Defendant who was making a left hand turn. Although there was contradictory evidence about the… [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:09 am by Rob McKinney
Starting today, I will be posting a series of video blogs on one of the most important pieces of evidence in a Nashville , Tennessee DUI case.  The Metro Nashville Davidson County Police Department uses a report called a 132 report in all DUI investigations.  Other than a blood or breath test, the 132 report is the most critical document to review in a Nashville DUI case.  I have broken down the report into sections for the discussion. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:13 am by lopeznoriega
Continúa la discusión en la Suprema Corte de respecto de la acción de inconstitucionalidad 32/2012 promovida por la Comisión Nacional de Derechos Humanos en contra de disposiciones que permiten a procuradurías la geolocalización de celulares sin autorización judicial u otros contrapesos institucionales. Desafortunadamente, la discusión tanto en la Suprema Corte como en los medios se ha [...] [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:09 am by Sarah Berry
In Texas, when parents are not appointed as “joint managing conservators” or “JMCs” for their children, one parent is appointed as the “sole managing conservatory” or “SMC” – this is the parent who receives the exclusive rights to make decisions about medical care, mental health care, and educational decisions, as well as the exclusive right to determine the child’s primary residence.  See Tex. Family Code § 153.132.The other parent is appointed as “possessory… [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 3:24 pm by Av. Şamil DEMİR
Msn messenger sa?lad??? anl?k yaz?l?, sesli ve görüntülü ileti?im imkan?yla art?k klasik haberle?me yöntemlerinin önüne geçmi? durumda. Hayat?m?za yerle?mesi ve kullan?m yo?unlu?u nedeniyle heberle?me hürriyetinin de kabul edilebilir bir unsuru haline geldi. Bu nedenle de kanun gözünde de ciddiyetle korunmay? … Okumaya devam et ? [read post]
Escroquerie en bande organisée par le biais de sociétés fictives : un réseau demantelé en Seine-et-Marne près de Fontainebleau (Mise à jour le 23 décembre 2010 à 10h00) La presse ne cesse de relayer des faits d'escroquerie en bande organisée; que ces derniers visent un designer styliste de renom, concernent un vaste chantage immobilier dans le sud de la France* ou  des clients qui , en guise [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:26 pm by Av. Şamil DEMİR
Adalet Bakanl??? taraf?ndan haz?rlanarak, Ba?bakanl?k Kanunlar ve Kararlar Genel Müdürlü?ü taraf?ndan TBMM’ne sevk edilen “Türk Ceza Kanununda De?i?iklik Yap?lmas?na Dair Kanun Tasar?s?” ile  TCK’nda özel hayat?n gizlili?ini düzenleyen maddelerde ciddi de?i?iklikler yap?lmas? öngörülmektedir. Öncelikle ifade edilmelidir ki yürürlükteki TCK’n?n yedi … Okumaya devam et ? [read post]
10 May 2012, 8:23 pm by Administrator
Next week is Bike to Work week, which makes it a great time to talk about qualified transportation plans. In 2008, section 211 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 added qualified bicycle commuting reimbursement to Internal Revenue Code section 132(f) applicable for taxable years beginning on Jan. 1, 2009. For employees who commute to work by bike, a qualified transportation plan can be set up to reimburse reasonable expenses incurred by employees for the purchase of a bicycle and… [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:09 am by Sarah Berry
In Texas, when parents are not appointed as “joint managing conservators” or “JMCs” for their children, one parent is appointed as the “sole managing conservatory” or “SMC” – this is the parent who receives the exclusive rights to make decisions about medical care, mental health care, and educational decisions, as well as the exclusive right to determine the child’s primary residence.  See Tex. Family Code § 153.132.The other parent is appointed as “possessory conservator”… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:33 am by Av. Şamil DEMİR
Türkiye Barolar Birli?i Yönetim Kurulu, Avukatl?k Kanunu m. 110’un verdi?i yetkiye dayanarak 13.01.2010 tarih ve 51 say?l? karar? ile “1136 say?l? Avukatl?k Kanununda yap?lmas? dü?ünülen de?i?ikliklerin belirlenerek de?i?iklik metninin haz?rlanmas? için” bir çal??ma grubu olu?turmu?tur[2].  Yap?lan çal??malar sonunda görü?e aç?lan Avukatl?k Kanunu … Okumaya devam et ? [read post]
28 May 2012, 7:09 am by emagraken
As previously discussed, having the right of way is not determinative of fault for a collision.  Reasons for judgement were released last week by the BC Supreme Court, Victoria Registry, demonstrating this in the context of a pedestrian crash. In last week’s case (Murdoch v. Biggers) the Plaintiff was crossing Blanshard Street in a marked cross-walk.  She did so against a red light.  There were 3 oncoming through lanes of travel.  The vehicles in the first two lanes stopped for the jaywalking… [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 1:11 pm
The Court of Appeal clarified what Labor Code Section 132a means - again. It appears the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has not adapted to the California Supreme Court's decision in Department of Rehabilitation v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (2003) 30 Cal.4th 1281 (Lauher).So, Fowler had significant spine surgery. Initially he could not be cleared to return to work as an order puller / machine operator. The doctor's restrictions permitted him to use equipment for just an hour a day. Then,… [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:26 pm by Av. Şamil DEMİR
Adalet Bakanlığı tarafından hazırlanarak, Başbakanlık Kanunlar ve Kararlar Genel Müdürlüğü tarafından TBMM’ne sevk edilen “Türk Ceza Kanununda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun Tasarısı” ile  TCK’nda özel hayatın gizliliğini düzenleyen maddelerde ciddi değişiklikler yapılması öngörülmektedir. Öncelikle ifade… [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:16 am by emagraken
Reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Court of Appeal discussing the extent of ICBC’s comprehensive coverage for vehicle fire damage under the former section 132 of the Insurance (Vehicle) Regulation. In today’s case (Swailes v. ICBC) the Plaintiff leased a Corvette.   The Plaintiff purchased insurance with ICBC which included “comprehensive coverage” for vehicle damage.  This coverage included loss caused by fire. Shortly after leasing the vehicle the Plaintiff “spun… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:33 am by Av. Şamil DEMİR
Türkiye Barolar Birliği Yönetim Kurulu, Avukatlık Kanunu m. 110’un verdiği yetkiye dayanarak 13.01.2010 tarih ve 51 sayılı kararı ile “1136 sayılı Avukatlık Kanununda yapılması düşünülen değişikliklerin belirlenerek değişiklik metninin hazırlanması için” bir çalışma grubu oluşturmuştur[2].  Yapılan… [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:50 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
The following is a guest blog post by Gregory Grinberg, workers’ compensation sole practitioner servicing the Northern California Bay Area. His firm specializes in workers’ compensation defense law, and his blog, WCDefenseCA, deals with California workers’ compensation issues. One of the most reassuring things about insurance, even workers’ compensation insurance, is the thought that the unknown, those risks that threaten businesses and hopes and dreams, are now covered. Being insured… [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:13 pm
Takeaway: The BPAI found that the Applicant's evidence of unexpected results was insufficient to rebut the prima facie case of obviousness because the expert declaration failed to state the results were unexpected. Arguments in the Appeal Brief did characterize the results as unexpected, but the Board pointed out that "attorney argument is not evidence." (Ex parte Uchida, Appeal 2011000486.) Details: Ex parte Uchida Appeal 2011000486; Appl. No. 11/731,595; Tech. Center 1600 Decided: July 7,… [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Can Declaration Evidence be Considered “Written Comments” Since the advent of inter partes patent reexamination (IPX), both Requesters and Patentees alike have relied upon declaration evidence to bolster their respective positions. Practically speaking, the lack of RCE practice in patent reexamination creates a limited prosecution window relative to the prosecution of patent applications. For this reason, submission of declaration evidence by Patentees under 37 CFR § 1.131 and/or 37 CFR §… [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:50 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employers and business travelers get ready.  The Internal Revenue Service is changing its rules for substantiation of expenses for lodging, meal and incidental expenses incurred while traveling away from home on business.   Announcement 2011-42, scheduled for Federal Register publication on August 8, will announce the IRS’ stop allowing taxpayers to use the high-low per diem method for substantiating lodging, meal, and incidental expenses incurred in traveling away from home.  Along with its… [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:12 am
A few weeks ago the Reexamination Alert blog ran a story (here) about a Tivo patent which survived an ex parte reexamination. (Details in PAIR, Reexam Control No. 90/009329). Though a great many reexams go to appeal, that wasn't needed here because the Examiner was persuaded by expert declarations filed in response to the final Office Action. The Reexamation Alert put it like this: TiVo’s present success is the result of an interview with Examiners followed by two very powerful declarations.… [read post]