Posts tagged with: "9-11 defendants"
Results 301 - 320
of 10,656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2011, 9:40 pm
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. 1:11-cv-01111; filed November 9, 2011 in the District Court of Delaware • Plaintiffs: Cephalon Inc.; CIMA Labs Inc. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 2:17 pm
Dec. 11, 2014) (creditor violated the stay by referring matter to worthless check program for prosecution); In re Negrete, Case No. 07–00540–9–JRL (Bankr. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 8:57 am
") Published: 9/6/2011 11:57 AM [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:01 pm
Perelman, No. 10-10571 (9-26-11) (Graber with Hug and Silverman).The defendant fraudulently obtained and wore a Purple Heart. [read post]
14 May 2012, 5:24 am
LEXIS 311 (May 9, 2012) [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 9:12 am
Having served with Director Mueller for eight years in the Bush Administration (and especially in the dark days after 9-11), I can attest first hand to his integrity, impartiality, and commitment to the rule of law. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:52 pm
Barraza-Lopez, No. 10-50280 (9-28-11) (Fisher with Pregerson and Berzon).When is the Speedy Trial Act clock rewound with a dismissal without prejudice? [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 1:05 pm
Judge O'Neill not only didn't order a mistrial (or even instruct the jury to disregard the comments) when the prosecutor made the improper analogy to 9/11, but also permitted the prosecutor to continue with these improper comments even after defendants objected. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:53 am
”Consumers who viewed the 9/11 Material as part of defendants’ programs were “not falsely informed about the origins of the [material] because [Defendants] did in fact produce” it. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:28 am
., No. 11 C 1921, Slip Op. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 9:01 am
Our Congratulations go to the Pace 2015 Pretrial Competition Team that competed in the Eighth Annual, National Pretrial Advocacy Competition in Gulfport, Florida, October 9-11. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
Securities Litigation, S.D.N.Y., 11 Civ. 09150 (KB) (GWG), 11/9/12. [read post]
13 May 2010, 8:25 am
Apple, 9:09cv011 (February 11, 2010) Judge Clark denied the defendant’s motion to transfer, and yesterday, the Federal Circuit affirmed that decision. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 12:20 pm
The current watchlisting system is almost entirely a creature of the post-9/11 period. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:14 am
After all of the misadventures on which our government has led us in the name of pursuing vengeance for 9/11, and out of all the people that it has held as alleged terrorists, if this prison camp and these commissions are meant to be used for anything, they should be used to try those whom the government believes to have been central to the 9/11 plot. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:50 pm
Opposition to this approach would be almost as rabid and entrenched as opposition was to the earlier attempt to prosecute the 9/11 defendants in lower Manhattan. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 1:24 pm
" Workers who claimed they were injured as a result of breathing the air when performing search, rescue, and clean-up work at the World Trade Center site in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks brought suit against various federal officials who are alleged to have issued issued reassuring -- but knowingly false -- announcements about the air quality in lower Manhattan. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 12:40 pm
That is as effective as asking the 9/11 terrorists if anyone gave them anything to take with them on the plane. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 10:00 am
Here's the international legal news we covered this week: [JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit [official website] ruled Wednesday [opinion, PDF] that Judge Scott Silliman [official profile] should have recused himself in a case concerning multiple defendants who were charged with aiding in the 9/11 attacks. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 10:00 am
Here's the international legal news we covered this week: [JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit [official website] ruled Wednesday [opinion, PDF] that Judge Scott Silliman [official profile] should have recused himself in a case concerning multiple defendants who were charged with aiding in the 9/11 attacks. [read post]
