Posts tagged with: "961" Results 221 - 240 of 707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2010, 8:41 am by Moseley Collins
City of Fremont (1978) 80 Cal.App.3rd 961), while opposing declarations are construed liberally and need only set forth evidentiary facts supporting merely a possible cause of action (Anderson v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:29 pm by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
., 839 F3d 958, 961 (11th Cir. 2016) upheld the district court’s dismissal of an ADEA suit claiming that Villareal was unfairly discriminated against by R.J. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:54 am by S & F Media LLC.
BEER GLASSES WITH LOGOS FROM BREWERS OR IMPORTERS-- HB 961 allows businesses such as bars to receive up to 10 cases of branded glassware --- 24 glasses per container --- a year from brewers or importers. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 1:38 am
Holidays bring increased risk of serious or fatal accidents on Illinois roads, according to 2008 statistics from the Illinois Department of Transportation: Memorial Day: 8 killed 726 injured in Fourth of July: 15 killed and 805 injured Labor Day: 15 killed and 803 injured Thanksgiving: 9 killed and 961 injured Christmas: 8 killed and 841 injured New Year's: 10 killed and 575 injured Last year, almost half -- 44 percent -- of fatally injured Illinois drivers tested positive for… [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 12:45 pm
""Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact inasmuch as he "did not set forth the requisite factual allegations demonstrating that, but for defendants' alleged negligence, there would have been a more favorable outcome in the underlying action" (Ellsworth v Foley, 24 AD3d 1239, lv denied 6 NY3d 712; see generally Williams v Kublick, 302 AD2d 961), i.e., he failed to raise an issue of fact whether he would have prevailed on an appeal with… [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:47 am by tracey
Supreme Court The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council [2012] UKSC 34 (18 July 2012) Munir & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 32 (18 July 2012) Alvi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 33 (18 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Horn & Ors v Commercial Acceptances Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 958 (19 July 2012) Maidment v Attwood & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 998 (19 July… [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 4:53 am by Brian Shiffrin
Petrovich (87 NY2d 961), the Court was presented with a related question: as between the defendant and his counsel, who decides whether the affirmative defense of extreme emotional distress should be submitted to the jury? [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:20 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
., 355 F.3d 961 (2004), the Alvarado Court found that the ADA specifically excludes a retaliation claim under Section 12203 from awards of  compensatory and punitive damages. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:48 pm
., 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2004) has held that such claims are preempted; the Second Circuit in Desiano v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:13 am
See McDonald, 453 F.3d at 961-62 (holding that the good faith exception does not apply because a "stop based on a subjective belief that a law has been broken, when no violation actually occurred, is not objectively reasonable. [read post]