Posts tagged with: "ICBC-Chronic-Pain-Cases" Results 41 - 60 of 107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 9:45 am by emagraken
This case is also worth reviewing for the assessment of non-pecuniary damages for the Plaintiff’s serious injuries. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 1:30 pm
In addition to a useful and lengthy discussion on credibility in chronic pain cases Mr. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 1:34 pm
 This left the issue of quantum of damages (value of the ICBC case) to be decided by the trial judge. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 3:42 pm by MacIsaac
These reports commented on the Plaintiff's chronic myofascial pain. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 11:51 pm
’ This case is worth reviewing for anyone advancing a contested pscyhological injury claim with ICBC as it gives insight into the complexity involved in prosecuting such cases. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 8:04 pm
  I conclude he is not completely recovered, for he now has occasional or sporadic pain which has become chronic. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 9:59 pm by MacIsaac
       muscle wasting. [12] However, I accept that the plaintiff does have ongoing chronic pain in her shoulder which is exacerbated by certain movements. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 3:00 am by Administrator
… BC Injury Law and ICBC Claims Blog$75,000 Non-Pecuniary Assessment for Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, Chilliwack Registry, assessing damages for a chronic neck injury caused by a motor vehicle collision. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:18 am by emagraken
  She takes Tylenol and Cyclobenzaprine on occasion, and she finds that she must remain active and exercise, as inactivity will make her symptoms worse. [73]        The plaintiff’s pain is not chronic and continuous, but she suffers pain and increased pain with certain kinds of exertion. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 12:01 pm by emagraken
This week the BC Court of Appeal released reasons for judgement ordering a new trial following a chronic pain case which resulted in a $525,000 damage assessment. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:13 am by emagraken
 Despite this, the case still has value as a precedent for non-pecuniary damage assessments for chronic pain following a motor vehicle collision. [read post]