Posts tagged with: "Secretary of State" Results 221 - 240 of 45,861
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2009, 2:45 am by traceydennis
R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] EWCA Civ 1291; [2009] WLR (D) 350 “A convicted person seeking compensation as a result of reversal of his conviction on the basis of new or newly discovered facts establishing beyond reasonable doubt that there had been a miscarriage of justice had to show that the facts had been unknown to the convicted person during the trial process or an in-time appeal. [read post]
The post Nevada Secretary of State orders halt in county’s ballot count hours after state high court says the process violates law appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 2:52 am by traceydennis
Regina (Webb) v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] WLR (D) 241 “S 116 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 conferred a unique statutory power to sentence a defendant for a new offence committed while on release on licence for an earlier offence. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am by sally
R (Daley-Murdock) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 161; [2011] WLR (D) 56 “It was contrary to the policy and objects of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 to impose an obligation on the Secretary of State when refusing an overstayer’s application for leave to remain to make an appealable removal decision at the same time which would confer a right of appeal. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 1:59 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Court of Appeal “The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions did not owe a common law duty of care in discharging his functions under the Child Support Act 1991″ The Times, 6th  July 2007   Source: www.timesonline.co.uk Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication     [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 8:33 am
Regina (Baiai and Another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department House of Lords “Speeches July 30, 2008 The statutory scheme requiring the permission of the Secretary of State for the Home Department for marriage by people who were subject to immigration control or were illegal entrants was disproportionate and infringed the right to marry protected by article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
There is, it seems, a claim that Servier's conduct amounts to an abuse of a dominant position, and we (and the Secretary of State) must now wait to see how that goes. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Yesterday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that the State Department has concluded that since March 2017 China has committed crimes against humanity against the predominantly Muslim Uyghurs and other members of ethnic and religious minority groups in Xinjiang. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:32 am by The Davis Law Group, P.C.
  Continue Reading The post Summary of Secretary of State Administrative Rule Amendments (Effective 11/12/21) appeared first on Chicago DUI Lawyer Blog. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:09 am
R (Low) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 35 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 15 “A worker, who was a national of a non member state, sent by a service provider exercising its freedom to provide services pursuant to art 49 EC, from one member state to another had to be lawfully resident [...] [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 6:32 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
In the process, Judge Robinson rejected some of the expert evidence submitted by Kobach in defense of the law and had harsh words for Kansas' Secretary of State. [read post]
26 May 2009, 2:59 am
Odelola v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 25; [2009] WLR (D) 162 “The version of the immigration rules which was applicable to the determination of an application for leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom was the one in force at the time the application came to be determined rather [...] [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:43 am by kirksanderslaw
In North Carolina Corporations and LLC's (limited liability companies) have until APRIL 15th to file the annual report with the North Carolina Secretary of State. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:28 am
Regina (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and Another Queen’s Bench Division “An English court would not make a declaration that existing national legislation was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights where there was a ruling by a Scottish court in respect of the same or similar legislation and where the government was in [...] [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:34 am
Hussain (Zakir) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Evasion of immigration controls for a long time was not in itself a reason for deciding that an applicant, unlawfully in the United Kingdom, should not be allowed to stay. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 10:58 am by Nonprofit Blogger
Secretary of State John Kerry delivered a remarkable speech regarding the indispensable role of Civil Society in democratic societies at the U.S. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:49 am
FH (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department “A two and three-quarter year delay by the Home Office in processing an application for indefinite leave to remain amounted to culpable and undue delay and produced conspicuous unfairness to a man who had evaded deportation in 1986 and lived under an assumed name [...] [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:05 am
MA (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “It was not only cases involving children where it should be rare to dismiss an immigration appeal founded on article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights, protecting the right to family life, on the ground that the claimant should apply for leave [...] [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:22 am
Regina (F) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “The absence of a right of review at any time of notification requirements imposed upon offenders who had been placed on the sex offenders register indefinitely was a disproportionate interference with the right to respect for private and family life. [read post]