Posts tagged with: "accc" Results 181 - 200 of 435
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2013, 3:18 pm by Howard Knopf
We also shouldn’t forget that AUCC’s and ACCC’s failure to even attempt to seek judicial review of the initial “interim” tariff in this matter set the stage for the current York University litigation. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 9:22 am by admin
This apparently very popular Bureau publication, first adopted by the Bureau from the Australian ACCC’s similar publication, includes discussions of current and popular Internet, telemarketing and direct mail frauds and scams including phony contests, deceptive prize notices, pyramid selling schemes, mobile phone scams, romance scams and more. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 9:17 am by admin
This apparently very popular Bureau publication, first adopted by the Bureau from the Australian ACCC’s similar publication, includes discussions of current and popular Internet, telemarketing and direct mail frauds and scams including phony contests, deceptive prize notices, pyramid selling schemes, mobile phone scams, romance scams and more. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 3:13 pm by Howard Knopf
AC justifies this because, in its view, the absence of AUCC and ACCC will leave enough time so that the Board can dispose of two hearings in the time allocated for one – with substantial new evidence of an unknown nature to be introduced on the record at an unknown time.As Prof. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:41 pm by Howard Knopf
He is one of the only two apparently active remaining participants opposing AC’s Post-Secondary Tariff proceeding at the Copyright Board, now that AUCC and ACCC have astonishingly withdrawn from the proceedings. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 2:30 pm by Howard Knopf
Likewise, Wanda Noel (lead counsel for ACCC) is quoted as saying: “This case is really about what is a short excerpt”. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:45 am by D Daniel Sokol
Caron Beaton-Wells, Melbourne Law School argues The ACCC Immunity Policy for Cartel Conduct: Due for Review. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:45 am by D Daniel Sokol
Caron Beaton-Wells (Melbourne) suggests The ACCC Immunity Policy for Cartel Conduct: Due for Review. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 12:23 pm
Baby dies after ingesting laundry detergent pod, CNN, August 16, 2013 CPSC and ACCC Warn of Poison Dangers with Liquid Laundry Packets, CPSC, March 21, 2013 American Association of Poison Control More Blog Posts:Boston Products Liability? [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:31 am by Howard Knopf
The deadline for objecting to the above proposed tariff was July 17, 2013.The only objections filed were by ACCC, CAUT and CFS.Notably absent was any objection by AUCC on behalf of Canadian universities.It will be recalled that AUCC abruptly withdrew its objection to the previously proposed tariff on April 24, 2012 after having settled with Access Copyright  in a manner that took almost all of AUCC's membership by complete surprise. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 9:45 am by JA Hodnicki
Daniel Sokol Anthony Gray, University of Sydney, Andrew Wait, University of Sydney and Bonnie Nguyen, University of Sydney have written The Prodigal Corporation: An Analysis on the Effectiveness of the ACCC's Immunity Policy for Cartel Conduct. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:01 am by admin
  The ACCC took the position that the relatively small sized stickers or statements of actual country of origin were insufficient to overcome the overall impression that the produce was Australian. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by admin
According to the ACCC, Coles had displayed some imported naval oranges and kiwi fruit beneath price boards that read “Helping Australia Grow” that included the triangular “Australian Grown” symbol. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 11:54 am by JA Hodnicki
Daniel Sokol Austrialia's ACCC has posted a transcript of Rodd Sims' comments at the Infrastructure Access Workshop. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia:  In the case of Google Inc v ACCC ([2013] HCA 1) the High Court of Australia held that Google was not liable for engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct as a result of the production of sponsored links. [read post]