Posts tagged with: "supreme+court"
Results 121 - 140
of 345,579
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2024, 3:52 am
Campaign Finance Maryland: “Elections Board Orders Nick Mosby to Return ‘Excessive Contributions’ from BGE and Correct Other Errors” by Mark Reutter for Baltimore Brew Elections Arizona: “Meadows, Giuliani and Other Trump Allies Charged in Arizona 2020 Election Probe” by Yvonne Wingett Sanchez (Washington Post) for MSN Georgia: “Homeless Georgians Could Face Hurdles to Voting Under New Legislation” by Nick Corasaniti (New… [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
When Newsom urged the Supreme Court to take the Grants Pass case last year, he said it was a chance for the conservative court to “correct course” for the entire American West. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:45 am
Hence, the recent decision of the Belgian Supreme Court seems to align with the solution which is retained by French Courts. [read post]
Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Whether Federal Emergency Treatment Law Preempts State Abortion Ban
24 Apr 2024, 9:20 pm
Supreme Court on Wednesday heard oral arguments in Moyle v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 8:55 pm
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s recent decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 7:10 pm
It was created largely by the Supreme Court in Nixon v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 6:28 pm
Some want the Supreme Court justice to retire so that President Biden can name a replacement before . . . before what happens, exactly? [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 6:12 pm
“Trump’s Immunity Claim Joins His Plans to Increase Executive Power; The former president is asking the Supreme Court to put the presidency above criminal law as he pursues a broader agenda of expanding the office’s power should he win the election”: Charlie Savage of The New York Times has this news analysis. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:14 pm
“Supreme Court Appears Sharply Divided in Emergency Abortion Case; The justices weighed whether a federal law aimed at protecting access to emergency medical care superseded Idaho’s near-total abortion ban”: Abbie VanSickle of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 4:51 pm
But he himself has a high likelihood of being deemed immune (by the Supreme Court if it comes to that) from state and local criminal prosecutions while in office. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm
Supreme Court denied certiorari in a discrimination case brought by a social work professor against her Christian college employer, leaving in place a Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling declining to find the professor’s claims were barred by the ministerial exception. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:50 pm
The impossibility of settler colonialism and its influence on the Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:28 pm
And I wouldn't hold my breath that the Supreme Court in its current makeup will uphold it. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm
The post Sam Alito Uncorks One Of The Dumbest Textualist Arguments In Supreme Court History appeared first on Above the Law. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 2:42 pm
“The Supreme Court’s likely to make it more dangerous to be pregnant in a red state; But it’s not yet clear they’ve settled on a rationale for doing so”: Ian Millhiser has this essay online at Vox. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 2:26 pm
" {In interpreting the statute, the Supreme Court of Rhode Island has imported many defamation doctrines, noting that plaintiffs should not be able to "evad[e] the limitations of a successful defamation action by using the alternate theory of a false-light claim. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 1:18 pm
“A new Supreme Court case seeks to make it much easier for criminals to buy guns; The fight over ‘ghost guns’ is back before the justices”: Ian Millhiser has this essay online at Vox. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 1:14 pm
Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that “Supreme Court sounds wary of Idaho’s ban on emergency abortions for women whose health is in danger. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:45 pm
Shortly after the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:28 pm
Under its "state action doctrine," the Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment applies to government actions toward citizens. [read post]
