Search for: ""Burlington v. Dague" OR "505 U.S. 557""
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2020, 5:07 pm
Dague, 505 U.S. 557, 562 (1992). [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:28 am
Dague, 505 U.S. 557, 562 (1992)). [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 6:39 am
Dague, 505 U.S. 557 (1992), concluding that “enhancements for contingency [was] not permitted under the fee-shifting statutes at issue…[and] Justice Scalia, writing for the majority, reasoned that enhancement for contingency would likely duplicate in substantial part factors already subsumed in the lodestar. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 7:39 am
Dague, 505 U.S. 557, 562 (1992) (quoting Blum v. [read post]