Search for: ""Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo" OR "544 U.S. 336"" Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2016, 6:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Broudo, 544 U.S. 336, 341-42 (2005), and that alleged misstatement must “actually affect” stock price, citing Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:55 am by Barry Barnett
Fifth Circuit decision Citing the Supreme Court's ruling on loss causation in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:05 am
Broudo, 544 U.S. 336 (2005)), not to a criminal securities fraud prosecution, making the distinction inapplicable. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:52 am by James Hamilton
For example, should the Commission provide a loss causation standard similar to the civil loss causation standard articulated by the Supreme Court in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]