Search for: ""Ex parte Republic of Peru" OR "318 U.S. 578""
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2020, 8:36 am
The majority also cites a 1943 Supreme Court case—Ex parte Republic of Peru, 318 U.S. 578 (1943)—but that’s inapposite, too, as Judge Wilkins explains (dissent pp. 8-9 n.2): The Court there decided that the petitioning party, the Republic of Peru, had a basis for immediate relief to remedy its own injury.Thus Judge Wilkins is right (p.8): “The majority cites no cases in which a… [read post]