Search for: ""Saucier v. Katz" OR "533 U.S. 194""
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2015, 9:32 am
Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 201 (2001). [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:01 am
Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 201, 121 S.Ct. 2151, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 (2001). [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 201, 121 S.Ct. 2151, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 (2001) (quoting Hunter v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 3:41 am
Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 202 (2001)). [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 3:36 am
Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 202, 121 S. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 9:04 am
Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001).) [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:34 am
” Saucier, 533 U.S. at 202. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:18 am
Katz, 533 U.S. 194] makes it clear that the "objectively reasonable" inquiry is part of the "clearly established" inquiry. 533 U.S. at 202. ... [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:30 am
Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001), should not be regarded as an inflexible requirement; and 2) petitioners were entitled to qualified immunity on the ground that it was not clearly established at the time of the search that their conduct was unconstitutional. .. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:19 am
Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001), should not be regarded as an inflexible requirement; and 2) petitioners were entitled to qualified immunity on the ground that it was not clearly established at the time of the search that their conduct was unconstitutional. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:53 pm
Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001)). [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 12:54 pm
Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001), should not be regarded as an inflexible requirement; and 2) petitioners were entitled to qualified immunity on the ground that it was not clearly established at the time of the search that their conduct was unconstitutional. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001) should be overruled? [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 1:55 pm
Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 206 (2001). [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 11:53 am
Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001) should be overruled? [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:42 pm
Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001) should be overruled. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 201 (2001); Davis, 442 U.S. at 249; Butera, 235 F.3d at 646. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 11:11 am
Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001) should be overruled? [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 7:05 am
Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001) should be overruled? [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 7:19 pm
Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001). [read post]