Search for: ""Wickard v. Filburn" OR "317 U.S. 111""
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2022, 1:05 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942) (holding that Congress could regulate home-grown wheat under its Commerce Clause power). [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Law, Literature, and Other Performing Arts, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 1:33 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), where the Supreme Court interpreted the Commerce Clause to give Congress the power to regulate activity that has a substantial effect on interstate commerce. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 1:33 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), where the Supreme Court interpreted the Commerce Clause to give Congress the power to regulate activity that has a substantial effect on interstate commerce. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942) Crowell v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 6:32 am
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942). [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 10:59 am
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), but that case and others to the same effect were wrongly decided, as I have argued in several articles:A defect in the ConstitutionMcCulloch ReduxDiagram of Necessary and Proper ClauseThe original meaning of "carrying into execution"What "commerce" meant to the FramersUnnecessary and ImproperWhat happened with Wickard? [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:56 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111, 63 S.Ct. 82 (1942). [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:56 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111, 63 S.Ct. 82 (1942). [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:55 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), has been the subject of extensive discussion on Agricultural Law, a sister site within the Jurisdynamics Network. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:51 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), has been the subject of extensive discussion on Agricultural Law. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:24 am
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942) ) what couldn't the court do? [read post]
5 May 2012, 7:49 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), is shaping up as the most important agricultural law case ever decided by the Supreme Court. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:57 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), offers a novel perspective on global federalism and the fundamental nature of the state. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:54 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), offers a novel perspective on global federalism and the fundamental nature of the state. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), which held that growing wheat on one's farm for personal use is not beyond the reach of the power of the federal government under the Commerce Clause. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), which held that growing wheat on one's farm for personal use is not beyond the reach of the power of the federal government under the Commerce Clause. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:04 am
Filburn 317 U.S. 111 (1942) has always been a thorn in the side of the Tea party/Federalist/Scalia/Thomas crowd). [read post]
