Search for: ""Ybarra v. Illinois" OR "444 U.S. 85""
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
Illinois, 439 US 128, 130 n.1 (1978). [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:38 pm
Illinois, 439 US 128, 130 n.1 (1978). [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 4:41 pm
Illinois, 444 U.S. 85 (1979), for the proposition that mere proximity to others suspected of criminal activity does not create probable cause to search that person. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 5:57 pm
Illinois, 444 U.S. 85, 93-94 (1979) (“Nothing in Terry can be understood to allow . . . any search whatever for anything but weapons. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm
Illinois, 444 U.S. 85, 93-94 (1979) (“Nothing in Terry can be understood to allow . . . any search whatever for anything but weapons. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 5:31 am
Illinois, 444 U.S. 85, 90, 100 S. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 4:24 am
Illinois, 444 U.S. 85 (1979), which holds that "a person’s mere propinquity to others independently suspected of criminal activity does not, without more, give rise to probable cause to search that person. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:28 am
Illinois, 444 U.S. 85 (1979), the police can’t search anyone who happens to be at the scene when a warrant is executed. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:38 am
Illinois, 444 U.S. 85 (1979), the police can’t search anyone who happens to be at the scene when a warrant is executed. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 12:36 pm
Illinois, 444 U.S. 85 (1979). [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 10:16 am
Illinois, 444 U.S. 85, 91, 100 S.Ct. 338, 62 L.Ed.2d 238 (1979)); see also United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:01 am
Illinois, 444 U.S. 85, 91 (1979). [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:57 am
Illinois, 444 U.S. 85 (1979)). [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 12:48 pm
Illinois, 444 U.S. 85, 91 (1979). [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 7:42 am
Illinois, 444 U.S. 85, 91, 100 S. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 2:36 pm
Illinois, 444 U.S. 85, 93-94, 62 L. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 12:02 pm
Illinois, 444 U.S. 85, 91 (1979) (holding that police lacked probable cause to search a person based solely on his presence in a tavern at a time when the police had reason to believe the bartender possessed heroin for sale). [read post]