Search for: "***lanham v. Matthews"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
”[4] Matthew Butterick, an attorney for the artists alongside Joseph Saveri noted that the judge “sustained the plaintiffs’ core claim pertaining to direct copyright infringement” and expressed optimism in the claim’s path to trial and the ability to address the court’s concerns.[5] On November 29, 2023, the artists and their legal team submitted an amended complaint, 94 pages to the original complaint’s 44, adding seven artist-plaintiffs: Gerald… [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
Q: Veuve Cliquot v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 5:53 am
It is a judge-made substitute for the Lanham Act test of infringement. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 1:31 pm
In the Board’s precedential decision in The Clorox Company v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm
Matthew Guarnieri, assistant to the solicitor general, argues for the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:03 am
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit held oral arguments on March 21, 2023 in the international trademark case of Abitron Austria GmbH v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 11:22 am
Midler v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:24 am
Astley v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm
Matthew Sag and Pamela Samuelson, Hysteresis: An Empirical Study of Copyright Injunctions After eBay v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm
” Lanham Act 2(a): false association: ability to block other registrations, gives estate leg up in establishing priority. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:38 am
Matthew Sag, Loyola University Chicago School of LawThe Missing Theoretical Foundation of Transformative UseCampbell v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 9:43 am
Baby-v-Crib-Complaint [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm
Inspire-v-Envista-Complaint [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 6:51 am
U.S. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 6:51 am
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 9:26 am
" But this morning the Ninth Circuit held (AFDI v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:18 am
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro, David Kopel and Matthew Larosiere discuss the institute’s amicus brief in Kolbe v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
In Matal v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:07 am
[We are all very proud of you, Matthew. [read post]
