Search for: "*du. S. v. Price" Results 1 - 20 of 284
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2024, 2:51 am by Jocelyn Bosse
If you were too busy last week to keep an eye on the IP news, here's the summary of the stories you overlooked:Trade MarksKeeping an eye on the IP news.Photo from SamMino via Pixabay.This Kat outlined the recent judgment in Société Civile et Agricole du Vieux Château Certan v Kreglinger (Australia) Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 248. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 7:59 am by Jocelyn Bosse
The judgment of Justice Beach in Societe Civile et Agricole du Vieux Chateau Certan v Kreglinger (Australia) Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 248 found that there was no damage, and therefore passing off was not established. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here, the plaintiff shareholder filed the lawsuit in the wake of declines in Key’s share price after bank executives announced reductions in the company’s earnings guidance, as the bank found itself required to pay higher interest rates to attract deposits. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Because the presumption in Baxter has not been rebutted, the damages owed to the respondents are equivalent to the difference between the sale price received by the appellants on the resale and the price received by the respondents on the initial sale to the appellants. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am by Zak Gowen
  The competition concern is that this pursuit of portfolio returns can disincentivize “business stealing” between the companies in which they have invested.[3]  For example, a company might ordinarily lower price or seek innovations to take market share from its competitor. [read post]
10 May 2023, 11:17 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Ciampi paid even more for the LeBaron than the manufacturer’s suggested retail price for the vehicle without 13,000 miles of usage. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am by David Kopel
That article is cited in the Justice Gorsuch's dissent in Oklahoma v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
” Later, Chief Justice John Marshall also was burned in effigy after writing the famous opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
New York State Liquor Authority[15] involved a New York law under which liquor distillers could not sell to wholesalers in New York except in accordance with a monthly price schedule that affirmed that prices in New York were no higher than the lowest prices charged in other states.[16] Healy v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am by Emma Snell
State Department spokesperson Ned Price said yesterday. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
Khan, it held that maximum resale price fixing is not per se illegal.[21] And, in 2007, the Court held that minimum resale price fixing should also be assessed under the rule of reason. [read post]