Search for: "*long v. Landers" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  I begin with Renée Landers piece for a quite simple reason: More than any of the others, she emphasizes the costs that are attached to a free-wheeling policy of access to guns. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:45 am by Emma Snell
” Peter Landers reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am by Dennis Crouch
  Chao was a patent attorney and patent litigator for 20 years before becoming a professor and I have long valued his insight. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 2:38 pm by Giles Peaker
This is something I’ve been mulling over for a while, and have sounded off about in conversations, but the ongoing proliferation of housing disrepair claims farmers (and associated solicitors) has pushed me to go public with something of a rant. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am by Lisa Ouellette
Pamela Samuelson & Mark Gergen – Disgorgement damages for design patents should be based on an assessment of the profits that can be causally attributed to the infringing elements in a defendant's product.Amy Landers – Proximate cause in patent cases should be reexamined in light of patent law's purposes.Erik Hovenkamp – The antitrust question can be addressed without inquiring into whether the patent is valid and infringed by looking at the… [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia State University College of… [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  There were Powell v Birmingham Mail (Clause 1), Landers v Darlington and Stockton Times (Clause 1), Dobson v Sun (Clause 1), Fellows v Sunday Mercury (Clauses 1 and 5), Choudry v Daily Mail (Clause 1), Buchan v Daily Mail (Clause 1), Rape Crisis v Daily Mail (Clause 1), Brown v Lincolnshire Echo (Clauses 3 and 5), Cousins v Times (Clause 1). [read post]