Search for: "-DGW Austin v. Grounds et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 1:01 pm
Microsoft asks the court to adjudge its motion to dismiss regardless of any commitments not to close the deal before a given date.Here's Microsoft's motion, filed late Tuesday afternoon Pacific Time:De Martini et al. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
The topic of malapportionment is well-trodden ground, with established measures borne both of legal necessity following Baker v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
In his view, lawyers are deluded into thinking that they can understand the relevant science, with law professors being even worse offenders.[9] Cross-examining a technical expert witness can be difficult and challenging, but lawyers on both sides of the aisle occasionally demolish the most skilled and knowledgeable expert witnesses, on substantive grounds. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
It is a legal invention and, as such, has analytical heft, but it is entirely bereft of empirical grounding. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
LASALLE, P.J, CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur. 2019-08292 DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION N.B.In the Matter of Myrna Bailenson, et al., respondents, v Board of Education of the Chappaqua Central School District, et al., appellants. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
LASALLE, P.J, CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur. 2019-08292 DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION N.B.In the Matter of Myrna Bailenson, et al., respondents, v Board of Education of the Chappaqua Central School District, et al., appellants. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
LASALLE, P.J, CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur. 2019-08292 DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION N.B.In the Matter of Myrna Bailenson, et al., respondents, v Board of Education of the Chappaqua Central School District, et al., appellants. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
LASALLE, P.J, CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur. 2019-08292 DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION N.B.In the Matter of Myrna Bailenson, et al., respondents, v Board of Education of the Chappaqua Central School District, et al., appellants. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am
Some other standout parts of the brief: The brief says: “HB 20’s anti-discrimination rule is just one item from the menu of regulations that a state can impose on the Platforms under this historic, well-grounded common carriage framework. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
” Austin, 237 Ariz. at 210 ¶ 29 (citing Reid v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 10:49 am
BP Holdings Company, LLC et al. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
NATIONAL MEDICAL IMAGING, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
Popovich, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 8:09 am
Karasik Seyfarth Synopsis: In Ituah, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 8:09 am
Karasik Seyfarth Synopsis: In Ituah, et al. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Lucas Nanny, et al., 13 C 1260 SMY (In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois). [read post]
