Search for: "12 Jane Does and John Does" Results 1 - 20 of 264
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
The amicus brief focuses on the importance of the case for artists and freedom of expression, framing the February ruling as a threat to the First Amendment.[38] Specifically, the coalition seeks the court’s clarification that an artist’s intent to sell or otherwise commercialize their art does not impact the balancing test between trademark owners’ rights and artists’ rights.[39] In an interesting comparison, the brief notes that Hermès itself took the name… [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:56 pm by admin
Badly conducted and interpreted science leads to research wastage,[11] loss of confidence in scientific expertise,[12] contemptible legal judgments, and distortion of public policy. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 4:43 am by Beatrice Yahia
Jane Choukeir and Nadine Awadalla report for Reuters. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 5:25 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
CLAIMANT’S VERIFIED MOTION FOR SUMMARY FINAL ORDER WITH REGARD TO SECTION 440.13(2)(f) REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF PHYSICIAN Claimant, JANE DOE, by and through her undersigned attorney, files this, Claimant’s Verified Motion for Summary Final Order. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:47 pm by Ryan Goodman
The apparently inadvertent posting of the docket entry does not appear to indicate any nefarious action. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 4:13 am by SHG
Most of us take for granted that pseudonymous litigants will use the name “John Doe” or “Jane Roe,” but that gives rise to a problem. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:49 am by Eugene Volokh
To give one example from the Ninth Circuit: The plaintiffs in this case previously were denominated "James Rowe, Jane Rowe and John Doe. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:01 am by Fauzan Siddiqui
Jane places and sets up the equipment at John’s preferred location. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 12:58 pm by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
And so I think we just had a lot of experience in dicksterity Kind of what does it mean to try these things and to experimented and to do that? [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am by Eugene Volokh
. [* * *] Summary of Argument John Doe is trying to punish Jane Doe … for accusing him of sexual assault. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:13 am by Eugene Volokh
 § 367.3, enacted in 2019, adds to that: A protected person who is a party in a civil proceeding may proceed using a pseudonym, either John Doe, Jane Doe, or Doe, for the true name of the protected person and may exclude or redact from all pleadings and documents filed in the action other identifying characteristics of the protected person. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 11:58 am by Ronald Mann
Because “nothing conditions the jurisdictional grant on the limitations period,” she reasoned that the 12-year statute of limitations does not impose a jurisdictional bar. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
John Fetterman Sponsored a Bill from the Hospital. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 8:37 am by Eugene Volokh
Defendant Jane Doe 2 and Defendant Jane Doe 3 … stopped Plaintiffs … and instructed them to remove their hats…. 62. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 4:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
John Doe, Jane Doe, and Sue Roe Are All Young Adults John Doe was in college at the time of the alleged misconduct. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 10:29 am by Eugene Volokh
As to reliance on a person's special worries related to possible stigma within his religious community, see the forthcoming Protecting People from Their Own Religious Communities: Jane Doe in Church and State. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, even if a law school does want to say that one side is correct—again, something I'd recommend against, for reasons given in the University of Chicago's Kalven Report[1]—it can do so, while still stressing that it's important for people to hear both sides: Come hear John Peters and Jane Williams debate immigration policy! [read post]