Search for: "19 Recordings Limited v. Sony Music Entertainment"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
For example, when a sound recording of a musical work gets played on Spotify, both the owner of the copyright in the musical work and the owner of copyright in the sound recording (the derivative work) are entitled to royalties for the public performance. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 8:55 am
On September 11, 2013, five major record labels (ABKCO Music & Records, Capitol Records, Sony Music Entertainment, UMG Recordings, and Warner Music Group) filed a similar lawsuit in state court in California. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
In some instances, they have written songs whose copyrights they have transferred in limited parts and in some cases for limited periods of time to major music publishers. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Google LLC v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Music Choice v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
A&M RECORDS, INC., a corporation; GEFFEN RECORDS, INC., a corporation; INTERSCOPE RECORDS; SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; MCA RECORDS, INC.; ATLANTIC RECORDING CORP.; ISLAND RECORDS, INC.; MOTOWN RECORD CO.; CAPITOL RECORDS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.NAPSTER, INC., Defendant-Appellant.JERRY LEIBER, individually and doing business as, JERRY LEIBER MUSIC; MIKE STOLLER and FRANK… [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm
RCA Records – Sony Music Entertainement (Filed: February 24, 2012 as 1:2012cv10357) 03) Hayuk v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
And finally Eleonora updated on the CJEU's decision in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment where the CJEU said that live broadcasts are not communication to the public within InfoSoc Directive, but Member States can protect them: "[The Information Society] [D]irective provides that broadcasting organizations may prohibit the provision to the public fixations of their broadcasts [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
.* Kimble v Marvel Entertainment: when post-expiry patent royalties meet stare decisisThe unsatisfying U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:49 pm
Jack, 2014 BCSC 1063 Cartier International AG & Ors v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd & Ors [2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch) 17 October 2014) Arista Records, LLC, v Tkach 15-CV-3701 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y Jun. 3, 2015) Sony Music Entertainment (Ireland) Ltd v UPC Communications Ireland Ltd (No. 1) [2015] IEHC 317 (27 March 2015) Copyright BestWater International (Order) [2014] EUECJ C-348 / 13_CO (21 October 2014) 1967 Ltd & Ors v… [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:52 pm
American Idol Lawsuit Claims Sony Stiffs Carrie Underwood, Kelly Clarkson 19 Recordings Limited v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:38 pm
Golan v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
To set the record straight: Lofgren was wrong, and Pallante was right. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
To set the record straight: Lofgren was wrong, and Pallante was right. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:52 am
On-line downloads of games generate approximately 5% of sales of interactive entertainment software products. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. 510 U.S. 569 (1994) 5, 7, 10 Computer Assocs. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:24 pm
Proposal lacks contours; doesn’t define space shifting, doesn’t limit to owners v. lawful possessors/renters. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
” (citation omitted)); Sony Music Entm't, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Fillo (NH)SONY Music Entertainment v. [read post]
