Search for: "A & M Properties, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 2,915
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2024, 8:30 am by Norman L. Eisen
” Krebbeks said himself during sentencing that “I’m not admitting guilt, because I still don’t think I’m guilty. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am by Joseph Scapellato
By Joseph Scapellato “”I don’t feel like I’m responsible for people that have reactions to it…” ~ Sam Kerson, in “Artist Sues Vermont Law School…” American property law is commonly analogized to a bundle of sticks, where ownership of property confers various privileges upon the owner.[1] If a person owns a television, for instance, that person has the exclusive right to use it, sell it, lease it, modify it, mutilate… [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm by John Elwood
There are nine newly relisted cases this week, so I’m going to be even more summary than last time in describing them. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:50 am by Ryan Alexander
Seemingly, this amendment codified stockholder representative authority articulated by the Court in Aveta Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Azerbaijan On 13 June 2024, the ECtHR held that here had been an infringement on the Article 10 free expression rights in the case of RFE/RL Inc. and others v Azerbaijan (Application no. 56138/18). [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 7:57 am by Scott Riddle
The Chief Restructuring Officer as of the petition date was Benjamin Jones of Ankura Consulting Group, Inc. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:17 am by Will Yeatman
For my part, I’m struck by how these dissents go unanswered by the majority. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 9:59 am by Rosalie Chen
  “Payments from medical device manufacturers intended to influence a physician’s judgment about which medical devices or supplies to select are illegal,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian M. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
After TASER International, Inc. successfully sued Phazzer Electronics for various violations of its intellectual property, the owners of Phazzer, in plain violation of the court's injunction, just wouldn't stop selling stun guns! [read post]