Search for: "A PTY Ltd. v. Google, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2023, 2:46 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
On 23 March 2023, Gibson DCJ refused the defendant’s application for the serious harm element in the plaintiff’s claim to be determined before the trial in the case of GRC Project Pty Ltd v Lai [2023] NSWDC 63, on the basis that the plaintiffs established special circumstances in accordance with s10A(5) of the Defamation Act 2005. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
On 10th February 2023, the Federal Court refused leave to file documents sent to the court in defamation proceedings in the case of Rana v Google Inc (No 2) [2023] FCA 81. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
The work has been comprehensively updated to take in the latest case including Lachaux, Stocker, Serafin, Lloyd v Google, Economou, Wright v Ver, Wright v Granath, Corbyn v Millett, Duchess of Sussex v Associated, and Soriano v Forensic News. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
On 1 March 2022 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of SMO v Tik Tok Inc. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am
The first category is where, as stated in Akai Pty Ltd v The People’s Insurance Co Ltd, enforcement ‘offends the public policy of the forum whether evinced by statute or declared by judicial decision’.[12] This includes the situation ‘where the party commencing proceedings in the face of an exclusive jurisdiction clause seeks to take advantage of what is or may be a mandatory law of the forum’.[13] The prohibition in Australian law… [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:25 pm
In the case of Heath v LawTap Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 485 Mortimer J made an order for preliminary discovery in an action concerning online defamatory comments. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Murphy v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 381 criminal defence lawyer Chris Murphy was awarded damages of Aus$110,000. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm
Internet and Social Media YouTube users will be able to opt out of most gambling and alcohol adverts if they don’t want to see them, using tools set to be rolled out by Google in the UK next year. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm
Canada In the case of Sole Cleaning Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm
In the Courts Australia Aaren Pty Ltd trading as Price Beat Travel v Arya [2020] NSWDC 657 – the defendant was dissatisfied with the services she received from the plaintiff’s travel agency when flying to India. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm
Freelancer Int’l Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:03 am
Kocwa v Twitter Inc [2020] QDC 252, an application for an interlocutory injunction concerning a number of tweets regarding the claimant. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 3:15 am
Trend Hunter Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
Facebook, Inc & Ors. the Delhi High Court on October 23, 2019 held that Indian courts can issue orders to internet intermediaries like Facebook Inc., Google Inc. and Twitter to take down defamatory content published by users on the intermediaries’ platforms on a global basis. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:30 am
F-7, 2019 FC 261 (Google right to be forgotten) Broutzas v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
To be Frank, Nike’s lost out in LDNR LNDR Londoner mix-upFrank Industries PTY Ltd v Nike Retail BV [2018] EWHC 1893, High Court of England and Wales (July 2018)I covered the preliminary injunction won by Frank Industries in this case in Volume III. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 11:30 pm
Goldhar, 2018 SCC 28 Google Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 11:40 pm
(Uber South Africa Technology Services (Pty) Ltd v National Union of Public Service and Allied Workers (NUPSAW) and Others (C449/17) [2018] ZALCCT 1 (12 January 2018)) At first glance, it appears that Uber’s stance that there is no employment relationship between them and the driver partners removes the drivers’ entitlement to certain employee rights and benefits, in turn reducing costs to Uber users. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:15 am
& Anor [2017] NIQB 74 https://t.co/tf1MoTOcL3 2017-11-01 Second right to be forgotten case in Ireland Townsend v Google Inc. [read post]
